PLC 1991

1991 PLP 766 (PLC)

PRESIDENT OF UNITED BANK LTD. Versus UNITED BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION and others

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore High Court
Decided Date
Writ Petition No. 2697 of 1991, decided on 15th April, 1991.
Honorable Judges
Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1991 PLP 766 (PLC)
Forum / Court Lahore High Court
Bench Members Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J
Parties PRESIDENT OF UNITED BANK LTD. Versus UNITED BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION and others
Primary Law Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1991 PLP 766 (PLC)?

This judgment primarily cites: Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1991 PLP 766 (PLC)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore High Court bench comprising: Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1991 PLP 766 (PLC) (PRESIDENT OF UNITED BANK LTD. Versus UNITED BANK EMPLOYEES FEDERATION and others). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Faqir Muhammad Khokhar for Petitioner.
  • Asmat Kamal for Respondent:

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑S. 22‑D‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑Appeal‑‑‑Petitioner challenging order passed by Member, National Industrial Relations Commission and Full Bench of the Commission‑‑‑Contesting respondent however, stated that he had no objection if order of Full Bench of the Commission was declared without lawful authority and of no legal effect and case was remanded to Member of N.I.R.C. for reconsideration at an early date‑‑‑Held, that statement of contesting respondent appeared to be a fair concession in circumstances of case particularly when Full Bench of N.I.R.C. had itself in many cases held that no appeal before it was competent against interim order passed by its Member‑‑ Order of Full Bench of N.I.R.C. was declared to be without lawful authority and of no .legal effect and case was remanded to member, National Industrial Relations Commission for further proceedings. Late of hearing: 15th April, 1991.

Judgment & Decree

S. 22-D

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199

Appeal

Petitioner challenging order passed by Member, National Industrial Relations Commission and Full Bench of the Commission

Contesting respondent however, stated that he had no objection if order of Full Bench of the Commission was declared without lawful authority and of no legal effect and case was remanded to Member of N.I.R.C. for reconsideration at an early date

Held, that statement of contesting respondent appeared to be a fair concession in circumstances of case particularly when Full Bench of N.I.R.C. had itself in many cases held that no appeal before it was competent against interim order passed by its Member-- Order of Full Bench of N.I.R.C. was declared to be without lawful authority and of no .legal effect and case was remanded to member, National Industrial Relations Commission for further proceedings. Faqir Muhammad Khokhar for Petitioner. Asmat Kamal for Respondent: Late of hearing: 15th April, 1991. This petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, calls in question the order dated 4th April, 1991 passed by the Full Bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission and the order dated 27th March, 1991 of the Single Member. The facts have been adequately stated in order dated 6th April, 1991, passed by this Court and need not be recapitulated. The learned counsel for the contesting respondent states that he has no objection if the order of Full Bench dated 4th April, 1991 is declared without lawful authority and of no legal effect and the matter is remanded to the learned Single Member of the National Industrial Relations Commission, for re-consideration at an early date. This appears to be a fair concession in the circumstances of the case, particularly when the Full Bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission had itself in many cases held that no appeal before it is competent against interim order passed by the Single Member. As a consequence of what has been said above, this petition succeeds to the extent that the order dated 4th April, 1991 passed by the Full Bench of the National Industrial Relations Commission is declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings to the Single Member of the Commission, who shall decide the same without any further delay. The parties shall appear before the Single Member on 2nd May, 1991. M.Y.H./P-144/L Case remanded.