Home Maxims & Terms Buildings Regulations meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Buildings Regulations

Buildings Regulations legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1983 PLD 579 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Arts. 15, 16 & 71 read with Buildings Regulations, Regln. 157 and Sind Building Control Ordinance (V of 1979), Ss. 2 & 14-Building Regulations not having been published in Gazette, Regln. No. 157 could not be pressed into service to fix opinion of Committee or Controller of Buildings and Director-General of Karachi Development Authority-Opinion of Committee merely recommendatory in nature-Held, recommendations of Committee and action proposed by Controller of Buildings, however, could not be by-passed by Director-General,

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Buildings Regulations", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2324

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Buildings Regulations"

PLD 1995
Writ Petition No.10326 of 1994, heard on 25th May, 1995.

P L D 1995 Lahore 579

Dr. Miss HAJIRA ABDULLAH and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LAHORE through

Court:
CLC 1995
Writ petition No. 3309 of 1995, decided on 20th June 1995.

1995 C LC 1881

MUHAMMAD IQBAL and another ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and another‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 2015
2014-June-5

2015 C L C 84

MUHAMMAD SAYYAH-UD-DIN — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PESHAWAR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, (PDA) PESHAWAR and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1997
Writ Petition No. 18723 of 1996, decided on 16th May, 1997.

P L D 1997 Lahore 580

Mrs. SHAMIM RIZWAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑Reglns. 7, 17 & 51‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑ Constitutional petition‑‑‑Commercial use of residential premises‑‑‑Words "resident's profession" as used in Regln, 51‑‑‑Meaning, scope and import of‑‑ Running of gymnasium in residential premises‑‑‑Effect‑‑‑Entitlement‑‑‑Key words in Regln. 51 were "resident's profession" and then examples of doctor's clinic or office of lawyer or technical consultant's office had been quoted‑‑ Running of gymnasium was not "profession" by any stretch of imagination but "business" ‑‑‑Word "profession" would presuppose some special technical qualification, therefore, establishment of gymnasium was not covered by Regln.51‑‑‑No land or building would be used in such manner so as to be inconsistent with the prescribed use in any approved scheme or master plan as per Regln. 17 of 1984‑‑‑Every prospective builder must comply with all requirements of such Building Regulations‑‑‑No alteration even in existing structure could be effected without prior permission of Competent Authority.‑ Words and phrases.
CLC 1986
Civil Revision No.2269 of 1985, decided on 2nd December, 1985.

1986 C L C 599

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑Petitioner Versus Raja RIAZ ENTERPRISES Ltd. and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2005
W.P. No. 12793 of 2003, heard on 1st November, 2004.

2005 M L D 215

ANJUMAN JAMIA ISLAMIA, JAMIA MASJID, GARDEN BLOCK, NEW GARDEN TOWN, LAHORE though Nazim‑e‑Ala‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY through Director‑General, Lahore and 3 others‑ ‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2002
Writ Petition No.23 of 2001, decided on 15th January, 2002.

P L D 2002 Peshawar 99

ABDUR RASHEED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, BUILDING CONTROL AGENCY, DERA ISMAIL KHAN and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLD 2018
2017-November-8

2018 C L D 346

RIZWAN ALI and 5 others — Appellants Versus The COMMISSIONER (SMD), SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
PLD 1983
Constitutional Petition No. D-725 of 1981, decided on 8th February, 1983.

P L D 1983 Karachi 579

AMJAD MIRZA AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF BUILDINGS, ZONE VIII, KARACHI AND 10 OTHERS -Respondents

Court:
MLD 2007
2006-February-17

2007 M L D 260

HAMID FAROOQ and others — Appellants Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore