2005 PLP 215 (MLD)
ANJUMAN JAMIA ISLAMIA, JAMIA MASJID, GARDEN BLOCK, NEW GARDEN TOWN, LAHORE though Nazim‑e‑Ala‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY through Director‑General, Lahore and 3 others‑ ‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2005 PLP 215 (MLD) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Akhtar Shabbir, J |
| Parties | ANJUMAN JAMIA ISLAMIA, JAMIA MASJID, GARDEN BLOCK, NEW GARDEN TOWN, LAHORE though Nazim‑e‑Ala‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY through Director‑General, Lahore and 3 others‑ ‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Lahore Development Authority Building Regulations, 1984‑‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2005 PLP 215 (MLD)?
This judgment primarily cites: Lahore Development Authority Building Regulations, 1984‑‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2005 PLP 215 (MLD)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Akhtar Shabbir, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2005 PLP 215 (MLD) (ANJUMAN JAMIA ISLAMIA, JAMIA MASJID, GARDEN BLOCK, NEW GARDEN TOWN, LAHORE though Nazim‑e‑Ala‑‑‑Petitioner Versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORTY through Director‑General, Lahore and 3 others‑ ‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Ali Akbar Qureshi for Petitioner.
- Date of hearing: 1st November, 2004.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑Reglns. 10 & 12‑‑‑Lahore Improvement Trust Resolution No.18, dated 15‑12‑1973‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑ Coiistitutional petition‑‑‑Building plan‑‑‑Estate Management ‑‑‑Mosque‑‑ Registered "Anjuman" had submitted a site‑plan of the Mosque for rebuilding the same‑‑‑Sanction was refused on the ground that the plot underneath the Mosque was owned by Lahore Development Authority and Director Estate Management had required and asked the Anjuman to purchase the place/plot‑‑‑Validity‑‑‑Lahore Improvement Trust (Lahore Development Authority) had reserved the land for Mosque‑‑‑Only objection raised was that area under the mosque belonged to Lahore Development Authority and petitioner had not paid the price ‑‑‑Validity‑‑ All the lands belonged to "God"‑‑‑Authority could not claim price of that land which was under the house of "Allah"‑‑Demand of the Authority for price of land was contrary to injunctions of Islam‑‑‑Regulation 12 of the Lahore Development Authority Building Regulations 1984 had required the Authority to exempt the premises used for religious, charitable or educational purposes from payment of scrutiny fee‑‑‑Act of the Authority was declared illegal and without lawful authority, void and contrary, to the injunctions of Qur'an and Sunnah‑‑‑Petitioner was directed to submit a fresh site‑plan and Authority was directed to approve the same. Mian Muzaffar Hussain Legal Advisor for LDA. Fowad Malik A.A.‑G. on Court's call.
Judgment & Decree
6. Section 10 of LDA Building Regulation, 1984, provides period for approval of construction plan which is reproduced as under:‑‑ Period of approval:‑‑‑(i) Within 60 days after the receipt of an application for permission to carry out building works, the competent authority shall:‑‑ (a) Pass orders, granting or refusing permission to carry out such building works and in the case of refusal specify the provisions of the Regulations violated or (b) require further details of the plans, documents, specifications and any other particulars to be submitted to it. (ii) If the competent authority shall not have passed orders granting or refusing permission specifying the provisions of the Regulations violated within 60 days following the day on which all the necessary information has been furnished and all documents, plans, specifications and particulars called for have been submitted; or if such additional particulars have not been called for within said 60 days from the receipt of an application, it shall be deemed to have been sanctioned to the extent to which it does not contravene the provisions of these Building Regulations, scheme provisions if any, and Controlled Area requirements as the case may be."
7. The only objection raised by the respondents in their comments, is that the area under the mosque belongs to LDA and the petitioner has not paid the price of the same.
8. In the Holy Quran Almighty Allah in verse No.126 of Surah Alnisa' say that:‑‑ From the above, it is established that all lands of the world belong to "GOD" and the mosque' which is constructed on some portion of land in any part of world; that is a 'house 'of Allah' which is used by muslims mainly as a place for community‑worship of Almighty Allah, and no person or authority, in the world can claim price of that land which is under the house' of Allah: It means that it is the act of restraining the people of Allah to enter into the mosque for prayer. Almighty Allah, in Verse No. 114 of Surah Al- Baqara says that: It is the duty of Estate, Administration, the owner of Housing. Society, Municipal Corporations, Corporations and Town Committees to reserve places for Mosque rather from its own expenditure construct the mosque. In this context, Almighty Allah in Verse No. 18 of Surah Al -Tauba and Verse No.18 of Surah Al‑Haj say that:‑‑ From the above, it is manifestly clear that the demand of the authority for price of land on which the land had already been constructed, is contrary to the injunctions of Islam. LDA or its functionaries have no authority to demand the price for the place of worship. They must entreat forgiveness of GOD.
9. Section 12 of LDA Building Regulations, 1984 empowers the authority to charge fee which is as under:‑‑ Scrutiny Fees: ‑‑‑(i) The Authority shall charge for the scrutiny of building plans required to be submitted under these regulations and other matters arising during the disposal of plans or in course of its construction a fee to be known as 'Scrutiny Fee' at rates specified in Appendex ; 'C' and in such manner as may be fixed from time to time. (ii) The Authority may exempt from the payment of Scrutiny fee the premises, which in the opinion of the Authority will be used I for religious, charitable or educational purposes. Therefore, neither any kind of fee or price of land can be claimed or demanded from the petitioner by the LDA authorities and they have no authority to refuse the sanction of Map/plan of the petitioner for the re construction of mosque.
10. For, the foregoing reasons, the act of respondents/LDA, refusing to sanction site‑plan of mosque and demand of price of the place, on which, the mosque is already constructed, is declared illegal and without lawful authority, void and contrary to the injunctions of, "Quran and Sunnah". It is admitted that part plan is available in the file of LDA but the whole site‑plan is not available. If this is so, the petitioner will submit a fresh application along with site‑plan of the mosque for re construction of the mosque, with the LDA and the concerned authority is directed to approve the same within a fortnight and submit his compliance report to this Court.
11. The instant writ petition is disposed of in the said terms. M.I./A‑324/L Order accordingly.