Pleasure
Pleasure legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Word "pleasure" is related to "aesthetic" sense and cannot be defined in specific words.
"Pleasure", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/24456
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pleasure"
P L D 2019 Lahore 1
Malik MUHAMMAD BASHIR LAKHESAR, ASSISTANT ADVOCATE-GENERAL, PUNJAB — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2019 P L C (C
Malik MUHAMMAD BASHIR LAKHESAR, ASSISTANT ADVOCATE GENERAL, PUNJAB Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1953 Lahore 163
MUHAMMAD SHAFI‑‑Plaintiff‑Appellant Versus THE MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MURREE -Defendant‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1957 (W
Syed MUHAMMAD AYYUB (P. S. E. I. Executive Engineer, Irrigation)‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1968 Lahore 786
SHAFQAT MAHMOOD LODHI‑Petitioner Versus THE ACCOUNTANT‑GENERAL WEST PAKISTAN LAHORE‑Respondent
Court: West Pakistan Government Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1960-r. 6(1) (i)‑Servant absolved by Enquiry Officer holding preliminary inquiry ‑Second inquiry ordered by punishing authority not barred‑Principles of natural justice not attracted Result of first inquiry not final‑Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts. 176 & 177‑Holding office at pleasure‑Inseparable incident of so holding office is that service is terminable "without any cause being assigned"‑Such "pleasure" of State, however, "abridged" by provisions requiring affording of reasonable opportunity to civil servant for showing cause against dismissal, removal, etc.‑Object of disciplinary proceedings is to maintain purity of public service Criminal case where instituted and disciplinary action to adjudge fitness for further retention in public service may proceed simulta neously or follow criminal case‑Principle of autrefois acquit or of res judicata not applicable to disciplinary proceedings Proposed second inquiry being in public interest cannot be throttl ed‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 403‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908),. S. 11‑Dwarkachand v. State of Rajistan A I R 1958 Raj. 38 dissented from.1988 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASLAM CHAICHEE Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF J&K through Chief Secretary and another
Court: Service Tribunal Azad Jammu & KashmirP L D 2013 Lahore 598
IMTIAZ AHMAD KAIFI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2023 C L C 1193
ABDULLAH MALIK — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1967 Dacca 109
PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus Maulvi MUHAMMAD ABED‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1960 (W
NASEEM AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, HOME DIVISION and another‑Respondents
Court: (a) Government Servant‑Arrears of salary‑Claim depends upon bounty of Crown: The State of Pakistan v. Mehrajuddin etc. P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 147 rel,