Criminal Prosecution
Criminal Prosecution legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
No prohibition placed under S. 20(4) of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, on setting into motion of criminal prosecution under general law and registration of cases under Penal Code, 1860.
Proceedings under any other law are not prohibited under S. 20(4) of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, it merely confers jurisdiction on Banking Court with regard to offences mentioned in Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001.
Delay per se no ground for holding that no offence committed. `
Not to interfere with proper rights or liberties of citizens.
Jurisdiction - Special tribunal created for trial of offence-That tribunal alone competent to try such offence.
Criminal Prosecution Criminal prosecution-Delay-View that time is of essence for competency of a criminal prosecution-No longer accepted as of universal application-Distinction to be drawn between delay in investigation and delay during trial of case.
Proceedings dropped by Government on accused's fuelling certain conditions-Government not precluded from re-starting prosecution.
Criminal Prosecution Criminal prosecution-Company or corporation whether and when can 6e prosecuted criminally-Electricity Act (IX of 1910), S. 42.
Parties -Crown and accused -Whether "Society" to be considered as a "third party" -Crown, embodiment of State. Parties -Crown and accused -Whether "Society" to be considered as a "third party" -Crown, embodiment of State.
"Criminal Prosecution", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2504
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Criminal Prosecution"
1999PTD 1917
Dr. A. A. HAI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another
Court: Patna High Court (India)2019 P L C (C
ABDUL HALEEM SIDDIQUI and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Law Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Pakistan Secretariat, Islamabad and others
Court: Sindh High Court2014 P T D 1807
TAJ INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. and others Versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE and others
Court: Lahore High Court1969 P T D 300
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, KARACHI Versus MESSRS DALMIA CEMENT LTD., KARACHI
Court: Karachi (Pakistan)P L D 1969 Karachi 261
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, KARACHI Applicant Versus MESSRS DALMIA CEMENT LTD., KARACHI Respondent
Court:2009 P L C (C
Syed MUNAWAR SULTAN and 6 others Versus PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary and 2 others
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1967 Lahore 1126
BASHIR AHMAD-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: (a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), Ss. 403 & 561-A Principle of double jeopardy not attracted to criminal prosecution of accused under S. 161, Penal Code (XLV of 1860) and S. 5(2) Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), who has already been punished departmentally and deprived of increments for two years cumulatively-No case for quashing proceedings under S. 561-A S. A. Venkataraman v. Union of India and another A I R 1954 S C 375; Maqbool Husain v. State of Bombay A I R 1953 S C 325 and A. M. S. Muhammad Qasim v. Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Madurai A I R 1962 Mad. 85 ref .2010 P Cr
ABDUL KARIM — Applicant Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION JAMSHORO and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi1999 M L D 2243
MAHABAT KHAN and 5 others — Petitioners Versus SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2018 P L C (C
STATE through Prosecutor-General, Punjab Versus JAHANGIR AKHTAR and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan