Home Maxims & Terms Domestic Tribunal meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Domestic Tribunal

Domestic Tribunal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1955 PLD 321 SINDH-CHIEF-COURT Judicial Precedent

Domestic Tribunal Domestic tribunal-Whether Courts can upset verdict of tribunal by-going into question of interpretation of by-laws

Karachi Cotton Association's Resolution suspending member for "becoming" member of another Cotton Association-By

Law 16 (j)-Does not apply to members who are already members of another Association.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Domestic Tribunal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2563

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Domestic Tribunal"

PLC 1970
Appeal No: HYD‑10 of 1970; decided on, 20th February 1970.

1970 P L C 356

GHULAM RASOOL KHAN Versus THE DISTRICT MANAGER, GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, HYDERABAD

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan
PLC 1970
Writ Petition No: 1379 of 1966, decided on 25th July 1966.

1970 P L C 707

KOHINOOR GLASS FACTORY LTD. Versus INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER

Court: High Court
PLD 1976
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 496 to 499, 522, 523_ and 534 of 1973, decided on 17th August 1974.

P L D 1976 Karachi 799

AHMAD HADI SHAH AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus RASHID TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Words "shall go into all facts of case'‑Indicate scope of enquiry by Junior Labour Court under S. 25‑A ‑ Intention of Legislature‑To provide a double check.‑Words and phrases‑Inter pretation of Statutes.
PLC 1976
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 496 to 499, 522, 523 & 534 of 1973, decided on 17th August 1974.

1976 P L C 444

AHMAD HADI SHAH Versus RASHID TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI AND ANOTHER

Court: Karachi
PLC 1987
Constitutional Petition No. D‑105 of 1980, decided on 7th September, 1986.

1987 P L C 23

SHANISHER ALI KHAN Versus SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1981
Writ Petition No. 9061 of 1980, decided on 14th October, 1980.

P L D 1981 Lahore 244

ZAFARULLAH‑Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY

Court: Art. 199‑Writ petition, maintainability of‑Student petitioner's case finding him guilty of adopting unfair means at examination under consideration on appeal before Appellate Committee‑Writ petition against order holding him guilty nevertheless, held, maintain able.‑Educational Institutions.
PLD 1975
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 927 and 494 of 1973, heard on 5th April 1974

P L D 1975 Karachi 288

IMDAD ALI-Petitioner Versus SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AND ANOTHER­-Respondents

Court:
PLC 1970
Appeals Nos. R‑I 188 and 193 of 1969, decided on 2nd October 1969.

1970 P L C 241

WORKERS' UNION (REOD,), RAWALPINDI Versus THE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, LAHORE AND

Court: Industrial Appellate Tribunal West Pakistan
PLC 1987
Constitutional Petition No. D‑103 of 1985, decided on 28th September, 1985.

1987 P L C 447

GLAXO LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) Versus SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1978
Constitutional Petition No. 960 of 1975, decided on 21st January, 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 601

MARBLE INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI‑Petitioner Versus KHAIR MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: S. 25‑A(5)‑Junior Labour Court‑Jurisdiction to go into facts --Expressions "In adjudicating and determining a grievance" and "shall go into all the facts of the case" occurring in subsection (5) of S. 25‑A - Provide another forum for determining grievance afresh after considering facts on which dismissal based‑Words "shall go into all the facts of th‑. case"‑Define jurisdiction of Junior Labour Court as a tribunal of facts in regard to matters dealt with by domestic tribunal‑Courts below refusing to go into merits of case, held, wrongly refused to exercise jurisdiction vested in them.‑Jurisdiction‑Words and phrases.