Home Maxims & Terms Establishment Manual Vol. I meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Establishment Manual Vol. I

Establishment Manual Vol. I legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 PLD 191 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Vol. I, Instruction No.2Punjab ESTACODE, Vol., I, Instruction 40.2

Delay in writing of Annual Confidential Reports and conveying of adverse remarks whether can vitiate the adverse remarks

Such question is not res integra

Instruction No.2 of the Establishment Manual, VAL which is in pari materia with the Instruction No.2 of Punjab ESTACODE Vol. I, is directory in nature

In view of pre-occupation of District and Sessions Judges and Judges of the High Court with ever increasing of judicial work, delay in initiating Annual Confidential Reports of some of Judicial Officers and conveying adverse remarks to them is immaterial and cannot obliterate the adverse remarks in question.

2004 PLC(CS) 236 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Vol. 1, Instruction No.2Punjab ESTACODE, Vol. I, Instruction No.2

Delay in writing of Annual Confidential Reports and conveying of adverse remarks whether can vitiate the adverse remarks

Such question is not res integra

Instruction No.2 of the Establishment Manual, Vo1.I, which is in pari materia with the Instruction No.2 of Punjab ESTACODE, Vol. I, is directory in nature

In view of preoccupation of District and Sessions Judges and Judges of the High Court with ever increasing of judicial work, delay in initiating Annual Confidential Reports of some of Judicial Officers and conveying adverse remarks to them is immaterial and cannot obliterate the adverse remarks in question.

1989 SCMR 2022 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S.13Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3)Landlord and tenant-Tenant's plea of absence of the relationship of landlord and tenant was rejected throughout

Tenant himself having executed a rent note in favour of landlord could not subsequently deny relationship of landlord and tenant

Tenant's plea that rent note was executed on 11-7-1985 while reg1stered sale-deed in landlord's favour was executed on 14-7-1985, would not make any difference because sale deed was prepared and executed on 10-7-1985 but was reg1stered four days later-Rent note by tenant in favour of landlord was thus neither improper nor illegal-Tenant, after executing rent note in landlord's favour, could not successfully deny relationship of landlord and tenant between himself and the acknowledged landlord

Tenant's further plea that landlord having himself asserted that tenant had sent the rent after execution of reg1stered sale-deed, his eviction application should have been dismissed in exercise of discretion, would be of no a

1986 PLD 684 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Establishment Manual Vol. IInstructions about Confidential Reports, paras. 30, 19 & 2

Annual Confidential Report-What to form and time for initiation of confidential report.-[Civil service].

1984 PLC(CS) 884 FEDERAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL Judicial Precedent

S. 2 (1) (b) (i) and Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Ss. 2 (a) & 4 read with Establishment Manual, Vol. I, Chap, IX, p. 389-Deputation

Word not defined

A technical word -Interpretation of statutes-Elementary rule of construction

Words and phrases used in a statute to be interpreted in their ordinary meaning-Such rule however not of universal application and intention of Legislature supreme consideration - Principle of literal construction does not apply in interpreting technical words, phrases and terms which are used in their technical meaning if acquired-Word "technical" broad enough to include statutes relating to service matters-Presumption that words and phrases are used with particular meaning in which used and understood in respective particular profession or business - A word acquiring a technical, meaning which is well-known to be presumed to have been used by Legislature in that sense and with that meaning rather than in ordinary sense-Guidelines issued by Establishment Division regarding terms "deputation" and "deputationist" are in nature of instructions and have force of law-Officer of Provincial Government with permanent status selected and appointed under Federal Government through examination under lateral entry scheme-Such Officer, held, would continue to be a deputationist under Federal Government so long having lien on permanent post under Provincial Government and not confirmed under Federal Government-Retirement of such officer under S. 13 (ii) of Civil Servants Act, 1973 by Federal Government impugned before Federal Service Tribunal-Such officer being a deputationist, held, not a civil servant under Civil Servants Act, 1973 hence could not invoke jurisdiction of Federal Service Tribunal-Tribunal however observing that Federal Government could undo the wrong if so desired by rescinding impugned order and reverting him to the Province leaving it to Governor to pass such order as deemed fit - Deputation - Interpretation of statutes.

1980 PLC(CS) 514 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Seniority-Deputationsist

Official having option to accept or refuse offer of appointment in other office/Department-Seniority on appointment in other office to run from date of transfer-Deputation period, held, merged in subsequent order of appointment and status of deputation ceased to he relevant for purposes of seniority

Establishment Manual, Vol.I, Chap. IX, S. No. 3, para. 6 (1) (a).

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Establishment Manual Vol. I", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2699

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Establishment Manual Vol. I"

SCMR 1983
Civil Appeal No. 161 of 1978, decided on 18th June, 1983.

1983 S C M R 765

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN-Appellant Versus Haji AHMAD JAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: -- Art. 212 read with O. & M. Establishment Manual, Vol. I (1968 Edition), pp. 389 & 390-Civil service-Terms "Department" and "deputation allowance"-Connotation-Grant of deputation allowance to a Provincial Government Servant-Held, depends on terms of his transfer - Provincial Government servant on deputation of Central Government Office appointed to higher post - Held, eligible for deputation allowance - Decision of Service Tribunal granting deputation allowance to respondent civil servant upheld.-Words and phrases.
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No.629 of 1988, decided on 2nd April, 1990.

1991 S C M R 209

Malik AZHARUL HAQ‑‑Appellant Versus DIRECTOR OF FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2007
Service Appeals Nos.3 of 2000, 38 of 2002 and 26 of 2003, decided on 5th September, 2006.

2007 P L C (C

QAISAR ALI KHAN Versus REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF SINDH and another

Court: Sindh Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1986
Case No. 135/609 of 1985, decided on 12th May, 1986.

1986 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ISMAIL Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE

Court: High Court
PLD 1969
Civil Revision No. 360 of 1968, decided on 22nd November 1968.

P L D 1969 Lahore 506

SAIF‑UD‑DIN MALIK‑Plaintiff‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH IRRIGATION AND POWER DEPARTMENT, LAHORE Defendant‑Respondent

Court:
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 38(R) of 1977, decided on 29th August, 1978.

1980 P L C (C

MUSHTAQ AHMAD Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER

Court: Service Tribunal Pakistan
PLD 2004
Civil Appeal No.8 of 2002 with Criminal Original No.49 of 2002, Civil Appeals Nos.633, 634, 173 of 2002, 1447 of 1998, 1621, 1622 of 1999, 336 to 338 of 2002, 1004, 1005, 1187, 1188 of 2002 and 13 of 2000, decided on 4th December, 2003.

P L D 2004 Supreme Court 191

Ch. SHABBIR HUSSAIN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1993
Appeal No. 56(K) of 1989, decided on 25th August, 1992.

1993 P L C (C

S.M. HUMAYUN AKHTAR Versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, ISLAMABAD and 2 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. 66 (R) of 1981, decided on 5th, September 1983.

1984 P L C (C

IKRAMUL HAQ Versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND ANOTHER

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1997
Civil Appeals Nos. 128 of 1993 and 5 of 1994, decided on 27th June, 1996.

1997 PLC (C

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD SULTAN, SECTION OFFICER, CABINET DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and others, Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and 31 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan