Beneficial construction
Beneficial construction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Definition not found in search database.
"Beneficial construction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2907
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Beneficial construction"
P L D 1979 Karachi 560
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Petitioner Versus SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: --S. O. 10-B(I), (4) as amended by Act II of 1976-Compulsory Group Insurance-Expression "such workman suffers death or injury out of contingencies mentioned in clause (1)" occurring in cl. (4)-Words "death" and "injury"-Connotation-Clause (4) covers cases of natural death and disability referred to in cl. (1).-Words and phrases.1997 C L C 43
Rao MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Education, Lahore and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1986 S C M R 747
SALEEM-UR-REHMAN and others — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, S&GAD, Lahore and others — Respondents
Court: ---R. 3(v) read with Punjab General Clauses Act (VI of 1956), S.19- Interpretation--Construction of orders issued under enactments- Beneficial construction of provision--Question arising for consideration whether expression 'Government servant' used in r.3(v) includes Government servants of Provinces as well as Federal Government-- Relevant rules having been framed under S.23 of Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974) which define word "Government" as "Government of the Punjab", expression "Government Servant" has to be given restrictive definition to mean Provincial Government servants.--Words and phrases.1995 P L C (C
ABDUL REHMAN Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1995 Supreme Court 546
ABDUL REHMAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑S.4‑‑‑Police Rules, 1934, R.16.32‑‑‑Appeal‑‑‑Revision‑‑‑Limitation‑‑ Computation‑‑‑Object of S.4, Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974‑‑‑Word "appeal" in S.4, proviso, Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 includes revision as well particularly when such remedy is provided by the Rules applicable to the aggrieved person‑‑‑If the rules provide remedy by way of revision in addition to appeal the aggrieved party should exhaust that remedy first before approaching the Service Tribunal‑‑‑Where such Rules do not provide for revision and any party files revision then such revision will be of no consequence after the period of limitation in such case should be calculated from the date on which revision application was dismissed.‑‑Appeal‑‑Revision.2020 P Cr
MUHAMMAD SHER KHAN — Petitioner Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2016 M L D 1999
Mst. NAFEESA MANZOOR — Appellant Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR UNIVERSITY through Vice-Chancellor, Muzaffarabad and 7 others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 1979 Quetta 179
MUHAMMAD, NIAZ-Petitioner Versus MARTIAL LAW ADMINISTRATOR, ZONE `D', QUETTA AND 4 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: (a) Martial Law Order 1977 C. M. L. A.'s--1984 P L C 232
EMPLOYEES UNION (C. B. A.) Versus MESSRS NEW JUBILEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind1991 M L D 1914
Mst. SHAHANA JAWED — Appellant Versus HAROON — Respondent
Court: Karachi