Home Maxims & Terms Islamic Jurisprudence meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Islamic Jurisprudence

Islamic Jurisprudence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 PLD 649 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Right to informationRight to privacyScope

The religion of Islam, undoubtedly is a complete and comprehensive code of life which provides full protection to privacy and confidentiality of every individual

It also emphasizes the importance as a mandatory injunction qua spying on others or unwarranted intrusion into their private personal affairs

In this regard, reference is made to Ayat No.12 of Surah Al-Hujurat.

2022 PLD 751 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Taking law into one's own handMob lynching and violenceProhibition in Islam

Law prohibits the taking of the law into one's hands, let alone to cause hurt or death, and this protection is also fully applicable to one who may be guilty

In Islamic jurisprudence even if a person has been found guilty and sentenced to death, the sentence cannot be executed by one who is not so authorized, and if he kills the convict, he is liable for the offence of iftiyat (wasting the right of the State) and is to be punished.

2022 CLC 1764 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Adverse possessionRepugnancyPossession howsoever adverse was, would not confer any ownership title to the possessee of the property

Claim on the basis of adverse possession was declared against injunctions of Islam.

2022 PCrLJ 953 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Sura. 4, Verse. 6Age limit for nikahScopeIt is not only balughat/puberty but also rushd, which is the second important criteria for a person to enter into nikah

Word rushd has been explained/defined as integrity of (one's) actions, proper, sensible conduct; reason, good sense, senses; consciousness; maturity (of the mind)

Meaning thereby a person who has attained puberty and he/she can form good decision and have maturity of mind can contract nikah.

2022 PCrLJ 953 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent

Where an act appears to be harmful to the society collectively or to a particular segment of society, the State has the power to make that act prohibited even if permissible generally in Shariah.

2021 YLR 924 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Justice in Islam, principles ofScope

Who succeeded in a litigation unjustly must not retain its benefit.

2021 YLR 924 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Justice in IslamScope"Appearance of justice" in Islam

"Appearance of justice" in Islam was essential not only for lawyers and intellectuals, but also for people of the country in general and the litigants/parties in particular.

2021 PLD 28 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
IkrahMeaning

Term 'Ikrah' means coercion or duress it is a general exception regarding applicability of rules and law under Islamic Jurisprudence.

2021 PLD 28 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
IztrarMeaningTerm 'Iztrar' means considerable urgency constraint

Iztrar is also a general exception to applicability of rules and law.

2021 PLD 28 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Sirka (Theft)Necessary ingredient to constitute theft is that thing which is stolen has to be in safe custody

Safe custody is called "Hirz" , a place which is considered by owner of thing as safe and it depends upon custom and usages.

2021 PLD 28 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Theft liable to HaddPrinciple

Necessary ingredient of Hirz to constitute theft liable to Hadd such ingredients wanes mainly under following situations:

2021 PLD 28 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Theft of trivial thingsScopeIn case of stealing trivial things, value of which is less than Nisab, Hadd of theft is not implemented

Such thief does not go scot free and he may or may not be subject to Tazir depending upon situation of the case.

2021 PLD 28 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Usul-al-FiqhScope

Number of Islamic Jurists over last fifteen centuries have developed principles of interpretation of dictates of Allah as prescribed in the Holy Quran

Whole subject has been developed for such purpose which is known as Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence or Usul al Fiqh ( )

Plenty of literature is available of Usul-al-Fiqh explaining rules for interpretation of verses of the Quran in a systematic, disciplined and uniformed way

Some of the prominent works are: Usul-i-Shashi, al Wajeez, Jamia ul Usul, etc.

Usuliyeen categorized words of the Quran in many categories according to their use, meaning, context and legal impact etc.

2020 PLD 407 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Rights of travellers (musafirs) and guests in IslamScope and significance

Treating a guest or traveler well was the most important belief in Islam, belief in God and belief in the Day of Judgement.

2020 PLD 394 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Life"

Concept of life in Islam stated.

2020 PCrLJ 662 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentObject of punishmentKinds of punishmentScopeMain goal of Islamic Penology is to secure human welfare, maintain peace and to establish a righteous societyAllah has sent His messengers and the Holy Quran, so that men can establish justice

Islamic jurisprudence has defined different types of discretionary punishments some of which are; admonition (Al-Waz); reprimand (Al-Tawbikh); threat (Al-Tahdid); boycott (Al-Hajr); public disclosure (Al-Tashhir); fines and seizure (Al-Gharamah wal Musadarah); imprisonment (Al-Habs) and banishment (Al-Nafy).

2020 PLD 110 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Right to informationScopeRight of Information was a longstanding practice and salient characteristic of Islamic jurisprudence

Concept of right of information explained through an example of an exchange between a person and Caliph Umar (second Caliph of Muslims.)

2018 PLD 6 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentPunishment for violating the rights of Allah ("Hadd')Punishments for violating the rights of individuals/ public at large ("Taazir")Compromise/pardonScope

Penalty for an offence against the right of Allah could not be waived off or commuted after due trial and conviction, however, the penalty for an offence against the right of an individual only, subject to various conditions, could be commuted

Violation of right of Allah could not be pardoned.

2017 PCrLJN 180 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentAcquittal and convictionPrinciple

Better to acquit ten guilty persons than to convict a single innocent person.

2017 PLD 63 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentBenefit of doubtScope

Basic guiding principle of Islamic law was that the accused shall be granted the benefit of doubt.

2017 PLD 63 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentConvictionStandard of proofScopeNo one could be punished on the basis of conjectures, surmises and suspicions

Presumption of innocence existed till the contrary was established by reasonable cogent evidence, as was required by the law

Where the required evidence failed to satisfy the Court affirmatively and bring home guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the accused stood entitled to acquittal.

2017 PLD 63 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentZinaConvictionScope

In an Islamic State, no one could be subjected to any punishment for committing unlawful sexual intercourse unless that charge was fully established by due evidence

Unless there was definite evidence against someone that he/she was guilty of unlawful sexual intercourse, he/she may not be subjected to the Hadd punishment regardless of all other external sources wherefrom information about the commission of that offence was gathered but was not duly proved in the court of competent jurisdiction, as was required by the Injunctions of Islam laid down in the Holy Quran and Sunnah.

2017 PLD 63 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Evidence'Tazkiyah al-shuhood' (Purgation of witnesses)Scope

Tazkiyah was a technical term of Islamic system of evidence which required clearing a witness from accusation or suspicion cast upon him by the opposite party, by holding an enquiry by a Qadi, openly or secretly, himself or through an official purgatory

Under Islamic system of law, like other legal systems, the opposite party had every right to test, weaken, or destroy the credit of a witness by cross-examination

Purgation did not bar such right of the opposite party but at the same time, it should not be used to the disadvantage of the party producing the witness

While cross examination was the right of defence, 'Tazkiyah al-Shuhood' ( )" was a duty of the Court to ascertain the veracity of witnesses in cases of Hudood that each one of them was just and righteous, worthy of credence, reliable, truthful and not a previous convict of perjury or other major offence

Tazkiyah al-Shuhood ( ) was the mode which was adopted for excluding all possibilities of innocence of an accused and ensuring absolute justice in each and every case.

2017 PLD 63 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Evidence

Principles with regard to witnesses stated.

2017 PLD 63 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.)Significance and scope

Sunnah was in fact the interpretation, explanation, elaboration, implementation and specific demonstration of Quranic Injunctions by the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.) himself, thus, its binding authenticity could not be questioned on any ground

Without Sunnah no one could ever be able to properly understand or act in accordance with the Islamic Injunctions, as required by the Holy Quran.

2017 PLD 33 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
SourcesSunahScope

Sunnah was an elaboration/explanation of the Injunctions of Islam as revealed to the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.) who was entrusted with the obligation of reciting the Holy Qur'an as well as teaching the injunctions of the Holy Qur'an

Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) was not only the recipient of the Divine Revelation, contained in the Holy Qur'an, but he was also its utmost authentic teacher, interpreter and expounder

Holy Quran had given complete injunctions, principles and precepts for guidance

For the sake of practical implementation of the injunctions and manifestation of the principles, however, Almighty Allah commissioned the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.) and assigned him the duty to explain as well as demonstrate by his personal example all that which was actually required

Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) thus set a perfect model which was shown to the people to be followed in letter and spirit

One would never be able to act upon any Islamic Injunction, in accordance with the Holy Qur'an, without following Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.).

2017 PLD 24 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent

"Equality before law" and "equal protection of law" was one of the fundamental principles of Islam which could not be ignored.

2017 PLD 12 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Interpretation

Islamic law is divine in its original sources, as such it necessitates great caution and meticulous care in dealing with the issue of interpretation of verses or in changing its universally accepted meanings to suit varying times, places and needs

Interpretation or meaning of a Quranic Verse, therefore, must have full support by the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.).

2017 PLD 12 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Sources of Islamic lawQuran and SunnahScope

Quran is the first source of Islamic law and jurisprudence; it is the fundamental source wherein there is absolutely no doubt; it has been sent down for administration of justice between mankind

Legislation in the Holy Quran was revealed gradually and intermittently to meet the requirements of events in Islamic State and society

Sunnah (i.e. sayings, deeds or tacit approvals) of the Holy Prophet (p.b.u.h.) is the second most important source after the Quran and is unanimously considered supplementary to, and explanatory of Quran.

2017 PLD 12 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Sunnah

Adherence to Sunnah is obligatory, subject to verification of its authenticity.

2017 PLD 1 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Islamic StateLegislative powers for maintaining law and orderScopeIslamic State was empowered to legislate appropriate laws for offences committed within its jurisdiction

State was bound to exercise its power and authority within the limits prescribed by the Injunctions of Islam, through the chosen representatives of the people

State in performance of its obligation had to legislate for maintaining law and order situation in all circumstances and had to resort to various measures including promulgation of laws for protection of life, honour and property of the citizens.

2016 PLD 865 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Sources

Main sources of Shariat are the Holy Qur'an, Sunnah, Ijma and Qias.

2016 CLD 544 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
LegislationScheme of legislation in Islam, based on Holy Quran and SunnahProspective effect

Many verses of the Holy Quran prohibited evil and unjust practices/transactions (prevalent before Islam), with immediate effect and stopped them forthwith, however such verses expressly provided that past and closed transactions were left untouched and, rather, waived off, even from the "Akhirath" point of view.

2016 PLD 4 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent

Decree of court-Significance-Decree passed by a competent court had great significance and sanctity in Islam.

2015 PLC(CS) 73 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Hajj"Meaning and connotation

Word "Hajj" (the holy pilgrimage) means "to intend a journey" which connoted both the outward act of a journey and the inward act of intentions.

2015 PLC(CS) 73 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Hajj"

Significance and reward of performance of "Hajj" in Islam stated.

2015 MLD 1022 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentConviction, basis of

Basic principle of Sharia/Law was that conviction must be based on evidence beyond any shadow of doubt, because the damage resulting from erroneous sentence, was irreversible; and the principle that it was better to acquit guilty person than to punish an innocent one.

2015 CLC 653 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
FatwaReliance uponScope

Fatwa could not be relied upon unless its author/signatory was produced in the Court and was subjected to cross-examination and entire circumstances were brought into his knowledge.

2014 SCMR 1034 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Crime and punishmentExtra degree of care and cautionJustice with mercyScope

Fundamental principles of Islamic jurisprudence on criminal law was to do justice with mercy, being the attribute of Allah Almighty

On earth such attribute had been delegated and bestowed upon the Judges, administering justice in criminal cases, therefore, extra degree of care and caution was required to be observed by the Judges while determining the quantum of sentence, depending upon the facts and circumstances of particular case/cases.

2014 SCMR 484 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Hajj"Meaning and connotation

Word "Hajj" (the holy pilgrimage) meant "to intend a journey" which connoted both the outward act of a journey and the inward act of intentions.

2014 SCMR 484 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Hajj"

Significance and reward of performance of "Hajj" in Islam stated.

2014 PLD 699 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Non-MuslimsForced conversion to IslamIslam did not compel people of other faiths to convertIslam gave them complete freedom to retain their own faith and not to be forced to embrace Islam

Such freedom was documented in both the Holy Quran and the Prophetic teachings known as Sunnah.

2014 PLD 699 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Non-MuslimsPlaces of worship, preservation of

Not only did Islam give religious freedom to non-Muslims, its tolerant laws also extends to the preservation of their places of worship.

2014 PLD 132 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Mosque

Mosques are for Allah and not for a particular group, party, sect (mazhab) or sub-sect (maslaq).

2014 PLD 132 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Mosque

Principles of Shariah governing mosques.

2014 PLD 43 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Marriage, termination of"Divorce" and "khula "Pre­conditions

Both divorce and khula were most undesirable options and were allowed only when the spouses genuinely came to the conclusion that continuation, of their union was harmful, making them unable to perform their mutual obligations amicably enough to live within the bounds prescribed by Almighty Allah.

2014 PLD 43 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Marriage, termination of"Khula" without recourse to courtScopeWord "khula' literally meant "to put off"

Khula denoted laying down by the husband of rights and authority over his wife, at her instance, on acceptance of consideration

Khula signified a conditional situation on the part of wife, entered into for the purpose of dissolving the marital tie at her instance, in lieu of a compensation paid or agreed to be paid by her to the husband out of her property

In case of mutual agreement on such an arrangement, the wife did not need to go to court and ask for dissolution of her marriage as in such a situation the husband would release her from the marital bond and the wife would be free to marry any other person after the iddat period, as would be required in her case, if she was or was not pregnant.

2014 PLD 43 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
MarriageScopeCivil contractMutual rights and obligations

Marriage was not a sacrament; it was not irrevocable but, in essence, it was a civil contract between husband and wife which credted mutual rights and obligations

Marriage contract was a life-long commitment, meant to last happily for the whole life between husband and wife.

2014 PLD 43 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Marriage, termination of"Khula" and "Mubarat"Single irrevocable divorceRe-marrying without any intermediary carriage/"halala""Khula" and "Mubarat" operated as a single, irrevocable divorce

Even thereafter both the spouses could contract fresh marriage with mutual consent, of course if they wanted to, without any intermediary marriage of the wife with another person, as was required in the case when a husband pronounced divorce for the third time; however, iddat shall to be incumbent on the wife if she wanted to contract marriage with someone else.

2014 PLD 43 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Marriage

Objectives of marriage in Islam.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Islamic Jurisprudence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2912

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Islamic Jurisprudence"

YLR 2008
Writ Petition No.1969 of 2008, decided on 8th May, 2008.

2008 Y L R 2044

FALAK SHER — Petitioner Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, BAHAUDDIN ZAKARIYA UNIVERSITY, MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1989
Regular Second Appeal No. 46 of 1988, decided on 14th February, 1989.

1989 M L D 4245

HASSAN DIN — Appellant Versus HASSAN DIN — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1989
Civil Revision No.173‑D of 1988, decided, on 29th October, 1988.

1989 C L C 445

MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE and 4 others‑‑Petitioners Versus KARAM BIBI and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1985
Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 1985, decided on 30th July, 1985.

P L D 1985 Quetta 228

MUHAMMAD SULLEMAN-Appellant Versus THE STATE -Respondent

Court: -.- S. 302/34-Islamic Jurisprudence-Crime and punishment--Credibility of witness-Divisibility-Trial Court acquitting co-accused and convicting accused on basis of same evidence !Said approach of trial Court, held, was opposed to Islamic Jurisprudence in as much as when a witness had been found false regarding one accused about whose participation he had disposed on oath, credibility of such witness regarding involvement of other accused in same occurrence would be irretrievably shaken.-Islamic jurisprudence
PLD 1991
Civil Appeal No. 789 of 1990, decided on 26th June, 1991

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 1051

Syed PHUL SHAH‑‑‑ ‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and 10 others ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ Respondents

Court:
PLD 1991
Civil Appeal No.87‑P of 1983, decided on 21st January, 1991.

P D 1991 Supreme Court 368

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, PESHAWAR ZONE, PESHAWAR ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus Messrs SIEMEN A.G.‑‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑ So long as the existing statutes were not brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam Art.227 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) their interpretation, application and enforcement, wherein discretionary judicial elements were involved, only that course would be adopted which was in accord with the Islamic philosophy, its common law and jurisprudence.
PLD 1992
Shariat Petition No.56/L of 1991, decided on 12th February, 1992.

P L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 385

M. NAEEM VIRK‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 2004
Civil Appeal No.66 of 2002, decided on 27th March, 2004.

P L D 2004 Azad J&K 17

AQAL HUSSAIN‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court:
CLC 1996
Writ Petition No.7409 of 1996, decided on 15th May, 1996.

1996 C L C 1987

M.D. TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT through Secretary, Cabinet Division,

Court: Lahore
CLC 1993
Civil Revision No. 380 of 1993, decided on 8th March, 1993.

1993 C L C 2053

MIRAN BAKHSH ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus BASHIR AHMAD‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore