Expressio Unius Alterius Exclusio
Expressio Unius Alterius Exclusio legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Expressio unius alterlus exclusio" (express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another).
Expressio unius exclusio alterius (the mention of one is exclusion of another Rule not absolute in-its application.
(i) Expressio unius personae vel rei, est exclusio alterius (express mention of one person or thing Is the exclusion of another) and (ii) Expressum facit cessare taciturn (what is expressed makes what is silent to cease).
Maxim: expressio unius alterius exclusio (express mention of one thing implies exclusion of another)-Statute limiting a thing to be done in a particular form necessarily includes negative i.e., thing shall not be done otherwise-Expression of a condition-Excludes doing of authorised act otherwise than as authorised.
S. 43 (6) [as substituted by Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) (Amendment) Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)] read with saving provision contained in S. 4 of Ordinance, and with 6(c), (e), General Clauses Act (X of 1897)Review-Extent of termination, by amending Ordinance, of Custodian's jurisdiction to review his order-Pending proceedings in review suo motu, or on application, treated on different footing by saving provision of S. 4 of Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)Section 6 (c) (e), General Clauses Act (X of 1897) cannot be invoked to continue review proceedings-Such proceedings do not pertain to a "substantive" right as contemplated by cl. (c) of S. 6, General Clauses Act, 1897 but to a procedural right, i.e. a right of review-Section 6, General Clauses Act, 1897, only applies when a different intention does not appear
Such intention, however, appears from saving S. 4 of Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)-Suo motu review not intended to be saved by provisions of S. 4 of Ordinance (LXIII of 1962)-Maxim: Expressio unius exclusio alterious, not of universal application Proceedings in review started on direction of Ministry, Refugees and Rehabilitation, Government of Pakistan, not deemed to be started on "application" but treated as suo motu in character.
"Expressio Unius Alterius Exclusio", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3125
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Expressio Unius Alterius Exclusio"
P L D 1971 Lahore 217
Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1991 Lahore 268
THE STATE — Appellant Versus NAVID ASIF and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1987 C L C 2516
MUHAMMAD, YUSUF‑‑Applicant Versus ASGHAR ALI and 5 others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Ss. 4(3) & 20‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 24‑‑Maxim; Expressio unius est exclusio alterius (the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another) ‑‑Neither the Rent Controller nor the Appellate Authority has power under C.P.C. to transfer a case from one Rent Controller to another Rent Controller‑ ‑Govern men t and not the High Court is empowered to authorise District Judge or Deputy Commissioner to transfer a case from one Rent Controller to another within the District‑ ‑Non ‑issuance of notification by Government authorising District Judge/Deputy Commissioner in that regard, would .not confer any power on the High Court. ‑‑Maxim.P L D 1976 Lahore 392
UNITED BANK LTD.‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL KHALIQ AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: --S. 15(4), Explanation read with Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 24, 151, 4(1), 96 & 100 and Maxim : Expressio unius est exclusio alterious‑Transfer of proceedings‑Sections 96 and 100, C. P. C., alone having been made applicable to proceedings under Ordinance VI of 1959, and section 4(1), C. P. C. not affecting any special or local law or any special form of procedure prescribed by any other law, maxim "Expressio unius est exclusio alterius", held, steps in and other provisions of C. P. C. including Ss. 24 & 151 rendered inapplicable to proceedings before Rent Controller‑High Court in circumstances, not to transfer proceedings pending before Rent Controller under S. 24 or 151, C. P. C.‑Maxim.1987 C L C 1397
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE‑‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
Court: LahoreP L D 1979 Karachi 204
MESSRS RASHID TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus BAKHT ZAMAN AND 2 OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- S. 0.12(5) read with S. O.'15-Termination of service on allegation of misconduct-Mention of only permanent and temporary workmen and total omission of probationer and badli workman in S. O. 12(5)- Held, clear indication that provisions relating to enquiry were not applicable to probationer and badli workman-Maxim: expressio unius est exclusio alterius (mention of one is exclusion of another). Industrial dispute-Maxim.P L D 1977 Lahore 1437
GHULAM MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA KHAR‑Petitioner Versus ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Homes of Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Elections) Order, 1977 President's (Post Proclamation) Order 5 of 1977‑1987 C L C 1503
THE CHAIRMAN, WAPDA and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus ADVISORY BOARD, PUNJAB LAHORE and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1981 Lahore 244
ZAFARULLAH‑Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY
Court: Art. 199‑Writ petition, maintainability of‑Student petitioner's case finding him guilty of adopting unfair means at examination under consideration on appeal before Appellate Committee‑Writ petition against order holding him guilty nevertheless, held, maintain able.‑Educational Institutions.2003 P T D 1276
Miss SUMBLEEN ANWAR and others Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: Karachi High Court