Pension of Judges
Pension of Judges legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Retirement benefits and allowances paid to judicial officers.
"Pension of Judges", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3269
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pension of Judges"
P D 1995 Karachi 223
AHMED ALI QURESHI ‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Art. 2(2)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts.205, 199 & Fifth Sched.‑‑ Rignts and privileges admissible to a retired Judge of High Court having served for a period of less than five years‑‑‑ Article 2(2), Pension of Judges of Superior Courts Order, 1993 clearly indicates that benefit arising out of the Order would extend not only to a Judge who had completed five, years of service as such Judge but also to every other Judge who had retired from service before completion of said period‑‑‑Reference to every other Judge of High Court in Art.2(2) of the said Order would be to a Judge other than the Chief Justice of that High Court‑‑‑Judge of High Court who had retired before completing five years of his service in the High Court to whom such benefit as envisaged by Art.2(2), Pension of Judges of Superior Courts Order, 1993 were denied was thus, entitled to those benefits including pensions to which other Judges on retirement (who had completed five years as a Judge of High Court) were entitled. pp. 229,230 A & BP L D 2008 Supreme Court 522
ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL, SINDH and others — Appellants Versus AHMED ALI U. QURESHI and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2024 P L C (C
Qazi KHALID ALI Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice and 3 others
Court: Sindh High Court2021 C L C 1520
Mrs. SAKINA SULEMAN, through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus MUHAMMAD ARIF JANJUA, through Attorney — Defendant
Court: Sindh2012 P L C (C
Raja SHAH NAWAZ KHAN Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary and 3 others
Court: High Court (AJ&K)P L D 1988 Quetta 70
M.A. RASHID‑‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN through Finance Division,
Court:P L D 2013 Supreme Court 829
Constitution Petition No.127 of 2012; H.R.C. No.40927-S of 2012 and Civil Miscellaenous Appeal No.176/2012 in Constitution Petition No.Nil of 2012
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2022 Sindh 403
RASHEED A. RAZVI — Appellant Versus Mrs. SAKINA SULEMAN and another — Respondents
Court: High Court