Katcha Peshi
Katcha Peshi legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Enactment containing general provisions and special provisions in respect of same subject?Special provisions, held, were to be considered as exception and if a person wished to take advantage of special provisions and, if any condition was imposed by special provisions, he must strictly comply with same.When a statute creates new rights and obligations and prescribes mode of their enjoyment or enforcement, such provisions, held, were to be construed mandatory as Legislature intended compliance of such provisions to be essential to validity of facts or proceedings.
"Katcha Peshi", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3335
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Katcha Peshi"
2006 C L C 1434
Messrs TEXZONE — Petitioner Versus THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, EXPORT COLLECTORATE, CUSTOM HOUSE, KARACHI and another — Respondents
Court: Karachi2012 YLR 2246
MUHAMMAD IQBAL — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR and 2 others — Respondents
Court: SindhP L D 1998 Karachi 127
LIMITED, KARACHI and 3 others — Co-Petitioners Versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH,
Court: High CourtP L D 1972 Karachi 471
Before Qadeeruddin Ahmed, C. J. and Agha All Hyder, J Versus Mst. ALLAH RAKHI BEGUM‑Respondent
Court: Held: The Sind Chief Court Rules (A. S.) do not apply to this Court. Moreover, if the above argument is accepted, then it would extend to every Letters Patent Appeal irrespec tive of whether it is barred by time or has been filed without paying proper court‑fee. Additionally, the argument does away with the distinction between a preliminary hearing and fulleso hearing in the absence of the opposite‑party because the emphasis is not on the nature of hearing but on notice to the opposite side or his pleader. This aspect of the view shows that the argument is capable of being stretched too far. p. 474A1981 C L C 111
IRSHAD ALI‑Petitioner Versus ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1991 Supreme Court 1082
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB ‑‑‑‑ Appellant Versus Messrs Syed SHAFIQUE AHMED (Registered) ‑‑‑‑ Respondent
Court:2008 C L D 326
SIKANDER TRADING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED and 6 others — Appellants Versus HABIB BANK LIMITED — Respondent
Court: Karachi1999 P Cr
Hyderabad — Appellant Versus LESLIE FREDRICKS — Respondent
Court: Karachi1999 P L C 435
SHAUKAT ALI Versus Messrs ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY and another
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh1986 M L D 1621
ZAFARUDDIN‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. QAISER JAHAN alias NOOR JAHAN‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi