Home Maxims & Terms Public revenue meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Public revenue

Public revenue legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 CLD 286 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Public revenue"

Its broad and general meanings.

2002 SCMR 1747 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Public revenue"

Its broad and general meanings.

1989 PLD 121 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Expression "public revenue"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Public revenue", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3356

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Public revenue"

PLD 1989
Writ Petition No.1105 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications No: 4717 to 4719 of 1988, decided on 18th December, 1988.

1989L25

PUNJAB CABLES‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑Preamble‑‑Central Excises and Salt Act (I of 1944), S.2(ccc)‑ "Duty" or "customs duty"‑‑Definition.‑‑Words and phrases.
PLD 1999
Civil Miscellaneous No.2 of 1996 in Writ Petition No.5766 of 1995, decided on 29th October, 1998.

P L D 1999 Lahore 96

IHSANULLAH‑‑‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, CUSTOM HOUSE, LAHORE and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 1983
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 7 of 1980, decided on 18th March, 1982.

1983 C L C 9

MUHAMMAD PARAL‑Appellant Versus TOWN COMMITTEE, CHAK, TALUKA SUKKUR Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 1995
Civil Miscellaneous No.4671 of 1993 (in Constitutional Petition No.1560 of 1993), decided on 1st June, 199.4.

1995 P T D 1092

M/s. NADIA GHEE MILL (PVT.) LIMITED Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Karachi High Court
CLC 1983
1976-June-7

1983 C L C 520

BRIG. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ AND 6 OTHERS-Appellants Versus UNJAB PROVINCE THROUGH COLLECTOR

Court: Lahore
CLD 2002
2001-November-8

2002 C L D 286

OF N.‑W.F.P., PESHAWAR‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs NOWSHERA ENGINEERING

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2022
2021-December-16

2022 C L C 1188

AYESHA SAJID — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Finance Secretary and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.468 to 489 of 1980, decided on 30th January, 1991.

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 464

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and another‑‑Appellants Versus Messrs Sheikh GULZAR ALI and 21 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑ O. XV, RA & O. XIX, R . 2 ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185‑‑‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O.XLI, Rr.11 & 17 ‑‑‑ Appeal‑‑‑Seeking adjournments and showing of no live interest for prosecution of appeal by counsel or lack of preparation on their part ‑‑‑ Effect ‑‑‑ Supreme Court, held, would treat such like cases as examples of lack of diligence and glaring non‑prosecution and appeal could be dismissed for non‑prosecution.‑‑Supreme Court‑‑Practice and procedure‑adjournment.
PTD 2006
W.P. No.3985 of 2005, decided on 15th December, 2005.

2006 P T D 1393

Messrs MUSKZAR KNITWEAR (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1997
Constitutional Petitions Nos.D‑495 of 1990, 380, 510 of 1991, 511, 850, 1991, 2814, 3020 of 1992, 593, 813, 1400, 1533, 2087, 2807, 3255 of .1993, 1664, 2165, 2352 of 1994, 2098, 2233, 2286, 2297 of 1995, decided. on 29th September, 1997.

P D 1997 Karachi 663

and others‑‑‑ Petitioners Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑Art. 199(4)‑‑‑Word "satisfied" occurring in Art. 199 of the Constitution‑‑ Connotation‑‑‑ Word "satisfied" would signify existence of mental persuasion much higher than mere opinion ‑‑‑Expression "satisfy" would, thus, imply that Court had been convinced that it had reached a clear conclusion.‑‑Words and phrases.