Scheme for Management and Disposal of Evacuee Trust Property
Scheme for Management and Disposal of Evacuee Trust Property legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Committee of Management of the Evacuee Trust Property had resolved to hand over the Hospital (trust property) to the Municipal Committee and Municipal Committee had taken over the control thereof with the sanction of the Commissioner of the Division
Administrator Evacuee Trust Property, in exercise of his powers conferred on him by Cl.10(1) of the Scheme for the Management and Disposal of Evacuee Trust Property, 1971 took over the control and management of the Hospital and the attached urban and agricultural lands
Administrator Evacuee Trust Properties, thereafter entered into an agreement with Municipal Committee and handed over the management and control of Hospital to the Municipal Committee
Notification of taking-over the properties was issued on 25-1-1973 and was in the knowledge of the Municipality since its publication and the Municipality had never challenged the same and. agreed to continue with the management and control of the Hospital under an agreement dated 16-10-1974 entered into between Administrator Evacuee Trust Properties and the Municipality
By entering into the agreement the Municipality had forsaken its right if any, to challenge the notification of take-over by the Evacuee Trust Property Board
Nazim and Naib Nazim of the Local Government being successors in office, had also no right to challenge the notification after 25 years
Trust having been created by an evacuee and under C1.10 of the Scheme for Management and Disposal of the Evacuee Trust Properties, 1971 Board was authorized to take over the control and management of the evacuee trust properties
Notification of take-over. by the Board could be challenged within 30 days and the Central Government was also empowered to call for the record of proceedings and pass such order as it deemed fit accordingly
Administrator of Evacuee Trust Properties, in circumstances, had rightly and competently issued the notification and same could not be said to be void
High Court, while dismissing the constitutional petition against the notification of take-over of property by the Board, directed the Board authorities to look into the matter and suitable grant be allowed for the maintenance and development of the Hospital from the current financial year.
Cl. 19 (j)-Pro bono' publico, party acting as-Locus stand! to challenge transfer-Contention that in transferring area in dispute to first respondent relevant law not followed hence transfer without effect-Such grievance having been shared by appellant alongwith numerous others, hence, its capacity, while agitating against orders of transfer equalled to that of a person raising a question pro bono publico-Party acting pro bono publico however, possesses no locus standi to call in question transfer of property in favour of a third party unless possessed of a personal interest in matter-Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98.-[Locus stand!].
Unautborieed possession of evacuee plot-Cannot be regularitted-Such plot, held, liable to be put to auction. (p. 10671A (b) Evacuee Trust Properties (Asanaaemeat and Disposal) Act ( Xitl of 19751
.
S. 25 and Scheme for Management and Disposal of Evacuee Trust Property, 1971-Oocupalion of plot regularlsed in favour of a person not in possession of same
Notice of ejectment issued to tenant having constructive possession of such plot-Held, mala fide in eireumttances of case-Such notice, having been Issued without lawful authority, struck down.
"Scheme for Management and Disposal of Evacuee Trust Property", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3561
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Scheme for Management and Disposal of Evacuee Trust Property"
1982S70
ANJUMAN ARAIAN, BHERA‑Appellant Versus ABDUL RASHID AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Cl. 19 (j)‑Pro bono' publico, party acting as‑Locus stand! to challenge transfer‑Contention that in transferring area in dispute to first respondent relevant law not followed hence transfer without effect‑Such grievance having been shared by appellant alongwith numerous others, hence, its capacity, while agitating against orders of transfer equalled to that of a person raising a question pro bono publico‑Party acting pro bono publico however, possesses no locus standi to call in question transfer of property in favour of a third party unless possessed of a personal interest in matter‑Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Art. 98.‑Locus stand!.2002 Y L R 1287
INAM ULLAH and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus CHAIRMAN, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1968 Supreme Court 119
A. R. NIAZI, ADVOCATE AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus (I) PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY, SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION DEPARTMENT, RAWALPINDI,
Court:2024 S C M R 622
CHAIRMAN, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY BOARD, LAHORE and others — Appellants Versus Sufi NAZIR AHMED and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1990 C L C 1429
ABDUL RASHID ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY ADMINISTRATOR, EVACUEE TRUST PROPERTY, KARACHI and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1969 Lahore 1066
ABDUL HAMID‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER/CHAIRMAN,
Court:P L D 1967 Lahore 459
Sh. ABDUL MAJID AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court2016 M L D 1114
ISMAIL AHMED and 11 others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M/O Religious and Minority Afairs, Islamabad 9 and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1985 S C M R 1815
Mst. NAWAB BIBI and others — Appellants Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and others — Respondents
Court: High Court