Home Maxims & Terms So required meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

So required

So required legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1987 PLD 22 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

"So required"-Meaning discussed-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VIII, R. 10. Ch. Nazir Ahmad Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Rao Muhammad Yousuf Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant. Karam Elahi Bhatti, Advocate-on-Record for Respondents.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "So required", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3664

Precedents & Case Laws citing "So required"

PCRLJ 1996
Criminal Revision No.393 of 1995, decided on 23rd October, 1995.

1996 P Cr

Mst. SOSAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1957
1956-October-10

P L D 1957 (W

GHULAM MUHAMMAD‑Defendant‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SAHIBAN‑Plaintiff‑Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1980
1979-December-3

1980 C L C 930

Mst. BILQEES BEGUM-Appellant Versus Syed ALI TURAB (REPRESENTED BY LEGAL HEIRS)

Court: Lahore
PLD 1987
Civil Appeal No. 172 of 1976, decided on 12th November, 1986.

P L D 1987 Supreme Court 22

Mst. HAKUMAT BIBI‑‑Appellant Versus IMAM DIN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ O. VIII, R. 10‑Written statement‑Failure of party to present written statement called for by Court‑Words "so required" used in R. 10 of O. VIII, C. P. C.‑Meaning‑Power given to Court by R. 10, O. VIII, C. P. C. to pronounce judgment against defendant, discretionary ‑Court, while exercising its discretion, would take into consideration all facts and circumstances of each case‑Such discretion having been exercised judiciously, judgment pronounced, held, would be valid and legal though passed without recording any evidence whatsoever.‑Words and phrases,
YLR 2003
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 4311/B of 2002, decided on 26th June, 2002.

2003 Y L R 1190

NASEER AHMED and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1967
First Appeal from Order No. 178 of 1965, decided on 13th April 1966.

P L D 1967 Lahore 779

Sh. ABDUL SABOOR & BROTHER-Appellants Versus GANESH FLOUR MILLS Co. LTD., LYALLPUR Respondent

Court:
CLC 1990
Suit No. 952 of 1987, decided on 14th September, 1989.

1990 CLC 349

Before Abdul Rahim Kazi, l Versus TARIQ KAMAL‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
PLD 2008
N/A

P L D 2008 Islamabad 11

Miss KIRAN ARIF MIAN — Petitioner Versus Miss KINZA KHALID and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2005
2004-December-7

2005 M L D 942

Haji ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus GUL RAIZ and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1990
Civil Revision No.17 of 1985, heard on 22nd March, 1990.

1990 C L C 1362

14ASSAN AODAS ‑‑‑ Applicant Versus MIR MUHAMMAD and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi