2003 PLP 1190 (YLR)
NASEER AHMED and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 2003 PLP 1190 (YLR) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rustam Ali Malik, J |
| Parties | NASEER AHMED and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2003 PLP 1190 (YLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2003 PLP 1190 (YLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rustam Ali Malik, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2003 PLP 1190 (YLR) (NASEER AHMED and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Malik Muhammad Imtiaz Mahl for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑S.498‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/34‑‑‑Ad‑interim pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused had stated that they were respectable citizens and had been falsely implicated in case with a mala fide intention and with ulterior motives‑‑‑Accused had further stated that they were ready and willing to furnish sufficient security for their appearance before the Court and also to join investigation whenever so required by the Police‑‑‑Accused had requested that they be allowed ad‑interim pre‑arrest bail so as to enable them to put in appearance before the Court concerned‑‑‑Request of the accused being genuine, they were admitted to ad interim pre‑arrest bail‑‑‑Accused could file a proper application for pre‑arrest bail before Court concerned and also to join the investigation.
Judgment & Decree
‑‑‑‑S.498‑‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.324/34‑‑‑Ad‑interim pre‑arrest bail, grant of‑‑‑Accused had stated that they were respectable citizens and had been falsely implicated in case with a mala fide intention and with ulterior motives‑‑‑Accused had further stated that they were ready and willing to furnish sufficient security for their appearance before the Court and also to join investigation whenever so required by the Police‑‑‑Accused had requested that they be allowed ad‑interim pre‑arrest bail so as to enable them to put in appearance before the Court concerned‑‑‑Request of the accused being genuine, they were admitted to ad interim pre‑arrest bail‑‑‑Accused could file a proper application for pre‑arrest bail before Court concerned and also to join the investigation. Malik Muhammad Imtiaz Mahl for Petitioner. This application for pre‑arrest bail has been tiled on behalf of Naseer Ahmed son of Muhammad Ameer and Javed Ahmed son of Amanat Ali who are involved in a case arising out of F.I.R. No.130 of 2002 registered on 24‑5‑2002 in Police Station Jhall Chakian, District Sargodha under sections 324 and 34, P.P.C.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has argued that the petitioners are respectable citizens and that they have been falsely implicated in this case with a mala fide intention and with ulterior motives and that they are ready and willing to furnish sufficient security for their appearance before the Court and also to join the investigation whenever so required by the Police. He has further argued that the petitioners had tried to have recourse to the Additional Sessions Judge, Sargodha but apprehending their arrest on the way they were unable to do so. He has requested that the petitioners be allowed ad interim pre‑arrest bail so as to enable them to put in appearance before the concerned Court at Sargodha.
3. Since the request of the petitioners seems to be genuine, they are admitted to ad interim pre‑arrest bail in the sum of Rs.50,000 each with one surety each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Sargodha till 5‑7‑2002. On or before the said date they may file a proper application for pre-arrest bail before the learned Sessions Judge, Sargodha and also to join the investigation.
4. This order of ad‑interim pre‑arrest bail will lapse on 5‑7‑2002. With this observation, the instant application for pre arrest bail is disposed of. H.B.T./N‑281/L Order accordingly.