Home Maxims & Terms Stare Decisis meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Stare Decisis

Stare Decisis legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2023 PLD 108 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Stare decisis

Meaning.

2015 PLD 226 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Principle of stare decisisApplication

Principle of stare decisis had to be determined in each case by discretion of court keeping in view peculiar circumstances of each case.

1996 PLC(CS) 364 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Stare DecisisPrinciple of

Scope.

1989 PLD 390 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Place of doctrine of stare decisis in law??Application??Binding effect of principle of stare decisis and situations when it can be departed from elaborated.

1987 PLD 145 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

RPs judicata-Doctine of stare decisis-Flexible in application and rigid adherence to doctrine excepted-Rationale behind doctrine of stare decisis is the need to promote certainty, stability and predictability of law, in criminal, fiscal and constitutional matters, for, law cannot stand still nor can Courts become mere slaves of precedents.[Precedent].

1972 PLD 59 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Stare decisis-Decision holding field for long time (78 years) and followed without dissent-Change not desirable unless decision found so unreasonable that it could not be followed under any circumstances.

1970 PLD 373 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Stare decisis-Doctrine of-Mere fact that some Courts adopted a particular interpretation of a legal provision-Not a sufficient reason for maintaining such interpretation if it is clearly opposed to some general principles-Only some Courts in country adopting particular view and that too for comparatively short period-Principle of stare decisis not applicable.

1968 PLD 185 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Stare decisis-Principle cannot have a more direct application than to judicial interpretation of a major instrument controlling governance of an entire country-Supreme Court refused to review its decision in Dosso's case (State v. Dosso P L D 1958 S C (Pak.) 533 and Province of East Pakistan v. Muhammad Mehdi Ali Khan Panni P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 387) pronounced in Martial Law period on "general grounds".

1968 PLD 712 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Stare decisis Precedent on subject scanty and new interpretation likely to be in interest of public or in administration of law itself-Rule of stare decisis, in circumstance, not attracted.

1963 PLD 79 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Stare Decisis Stare decisis-Doctrine has limited application in Pakistan.

1957 PLD 151 PRIVY-COUNCIL Judicial Precedent
Stare Decisis

Appellate Court's jurisdicton to order retrial-Exercised without challenge for over 50 years-Held, there was no valid ground to question such jurisdiction.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Stare Decisis", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3676

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Stare Decisis"

PLC(CS) 2025
Civil Petition No. 1124-K of 2023, decided on 20th December, 2024.

2025 P L C (C

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division and another Versus ABDUL RASHEED MEMON

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2025
Civil Petition No. 1124-K of 2023, decided on 20th December, 2024.

2025 SCMR 532

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance Division and another — Petitioners Versus ABDUL RASHEED MEMON — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1990
Review Applications Nos. 2‑C, 3‑C, 8‑C to 12‑C, 20‑C, 23‑C, 24‑C and 27‑C of 1990 and Civil Revision No. 464‑D of 1987, decided on 9th April, 1990.

1990 M L D 1901

GHULAM SARWAR‑‑‑Applicant Versus ALLAH DITTA and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1987
Civil Appeals Nos. 157 to 166 of 1974 and Civil Appeal No. 157 of 1972, decided on 17th December, 1986.

P L D 1987 Supreme Court 145

OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE CHAIRMAN, ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE

Court: ‑‑ RPs judicata‑Doctine of stare decisis‑Flexible in application and rigid adherence to doctrine excepted‑Rationale behind doctrine of stare decisis is the need to promote certainty, stability and predict ability of law, in criminal, fiscal and constitutional matters, for, law cannot stand still nor can Courts become mere slaves of precedents. Precedent.
PLD 2023
2023-January-24

P L D 2023 High Court (AJ&K) 108

Raja MUHAMMAD BASHIR KHAN — Petitioner Versus JUSTICE OF PEACE/DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MUZAFFARABAD and 2 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 2019
Civil Appeal No.699 of 2017, decided on 4th April, 2019.

2019 P L C (C

COMMANDANT, ELITE FORCE, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA and others Versus JAMSHED ALI

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1994
Civil Appeal No. 306 of 1994, decided on 2nd June, 1994.

1994 S C M R 1900

BADRUDDIN‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YOUSUF‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2019
2019-April-4

P L D 2019 Supreme Court 570

COMMANDANT, ELITE FORCE, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA and others — Appellants Versus JAMSHED ALI — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2000
Writ Petition No. 12025 of 1999, decided on 6th August, 1999.

2000 C L C 661

Messrs SANDAL DYE STUFF INDUSTRIES LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Pakistan Secretariat,

Court: Lahore
PTD 2006
M.As. Nos.22/LB and 23/LB of 2005, decided on 24th May, 2005.

2006 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan