Subject to all just exceptions
Subject to all just exceptions legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Expression "subject to all just exceptions" is used with purpose to preserve the right of opposing party to object to proceedings or matter, in the course of a trial, being improper and illegal
Under the expression the party excepting does not acquiesce in the decision of the Court but. reserves to itself the right to secure its reversal at subsequent stage of proceedings.
Expression does not contain express directions.
Expression "subject to all just exceptions" as appearing in order of High Court allowing application for amendment of pleading-Connotation-Order allowing amendment with such condition, held, reviewableCivil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VI, r. 17.
Expression "subject to all just exceptions" as appearing in order of Court allowing application for amendment of pleadings-Means that allegations in application for amendment and facts sought to be pleaded, not to be taken as having been accepted by other side and such party remains at liberty to challenge same and not that order itself liable to be reviewed-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VI, r. 17.
"Subject to all just exceptions", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3679
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Subject to all just exceptions"
2002 C L C 551
QAID JAUHAR and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. Hajiani HAJRA BAI and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 2005 Lahore 716
NIAZ through Legal Heirs and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SALEH — Respondent
Court: High Court1992 M L D 453
Mst. HAJIANI HAJRABAI‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus AFZAL ALI and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants,
Court: KarachiP L D 2011 Supreme Court 961
Ch. MUHAMMAD ILYAS GUJJAR — Petitioner Versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1978 Lahore 438
IRSHAD AHMAD AND 2 OTHERS-Appellants Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court:1997CLC379
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus S. MUNEER UL HUDA and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: Karachi1984 C L C 2138
SHER MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS‑ — Petitioners Versus SHAFQAT ULLAH‑ — Respondent
Court: Lahore2001 Y L R 1766
Syed MUHAMMAD ALI SHAH and 4 others — Petitioners Versus IJAZ HUSSAIN SHAH — Respondent
Court: Lahore1984 S C M R 66
AHMAD SAEED AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus THE MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1989 M L D 885 (2)
NISAR AHMAD‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi