1997CLC379 (PLP)
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus S. MUNEER UL HUDA and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants
| Citation | 1997CLC379 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Karachi |
| Bench Members | Rasheed Ahmed Razvi, J |
| Parties | PAKISTAN RAILWAYS‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus S. MUNEER UL HUDA and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1997CLC379 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1997CLC379 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Rasheed Ahmed Razvi, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1997CLC379 (PLP) (PAKISTAN RAILWAYS‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus S. MUNEER UL HUDA and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑‑‑O.VI, R. 17‑‑‑Amendment of plaint‑‑‑Plaintiff seeking amendment in plaint without notice to defendant had contended that suit had not yet been registered and neither any notice or summon were issued to defendants as such no prejudice would be caused if application for amendment in plaint was heard and granted without notice to defendants‑‑‑Application for amendment in plaint was granted subject to all just exceptions and plaintiff/petitioner was directed to file amended plaint within two weeks' time. M.J.A. Gazdar for Plaintiff.
Judgment & Decree
S. MUNEER UL HUDA and 2 others‑‑‑Defendants Suit No. 1085 and Civil Miscellaneous No. 4399 of 1996, decided on 3rd November, 1996. ‑‑‑‑O.VI, R. 17‑‑‑Amendment of plaint‑‑‑Plaintiff seeking amendment in plaint without notice to defendant had contended that suit had not yet been registered and neither any notice or summon were issued to defendants as such no prejudice would be caused if application for amendment in plaint was heard and granted without notice to defendants‑‑‑Application for amendment in plaint was granted subject to all just exceptions and plaintiff/petitioner was directed to file amended plaint within two weeks' time. M.J.A. Gazdar for Plaintiff. It is stated by Mr. M.J.A. Gazdar that the suit has not yet been registered, neither any notice or summon were issued to the defendants, as such no prejudice will be caused if this application is heard and granted without notice to the defendants. He has further argued that one of the office objection was in respect of notice under section 70 of the Cooperative Societies Act, for which he has filed instant application. In view of the above statement, this application is granted subject to all just exceptions. Amended plaint to be filed within two weeks' time, whereafter learned counsel shall satisfy the Court on the point of Limitation. H.B.T./P‑27/K Order accordingly.