Home Maxims & Terms West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme

West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 CLC 1651 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 2 & 3West Pakistan Rehabilitation and Settlement) Scheme, Paras. 4(A)(viii) & 31(ix)

Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), S. 14-B [as added vide Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) (Amendment) Act (XXXVI of 1974)]

Allotment of land to occupancy tenant

Petitioners who were occupying land in dispute subject to payment of one-third share of produce to landlord were declared to be owners of two third share in the land and remaining one-third was continued to be occupied by them

Such position continued till enforcement of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act, 1975

Remaining one-third of land having never been allotted to anyone, entire land was in occupation of petitioners as occupancy tenants at the time of enforcement of said Act

Land having stood vested in Government on enforcement of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons (Repeal) Act, 1975 same had to be disposed of in accordance with provisions of said Act which had laid down that in the first instance it was the right of occupants of land to purchase same on payment of price at prescribed rate

Petitioners who were in possession of entire land were entitled to be offered said land for purchase

Petitioners having deposited price of said land at prescribed rate, Authorities were not justified to transfer land to predecessor of respondents dismissing suits of petitioners

Authority having failed to exercise jurisdiction vested in it, orders of Authority were set aside and suit filed by petitioners was decreed by High Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction.

1991 SCMR 859 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Para. 71-A

Land allotted to appellant was cancelled on Mukhbari application on 21-2-1967 wherein no direction was given that said land be allotted to the informer

When land was cancelled from the name of appellant concession extended to informer of bogus allotments to claim the same stood withdrawn

No allotment having been made to informer, his n Mukhbari application lapsed and became ineffective with regard to his entitlement to resumed land.

1989 SCMR 432 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Para. 13Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss.10 & 11Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185(3)Land settlement

Leave to appeal granted to consider whether under the Rehabilitation Scheme an order of transfer of unsatisfied units from one estate to another, when both of them fall within the same Patwar Circle, is necessary.

1987 SCMR 1500 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 14 [as amended by Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Amendment) Act (LV of 1973) and substituted by Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) (Amendment) Act (XXXVI of 1974)]

West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, para. 71-A

Mukhbari information

Right of informants for allotment of land

Laws regulating right of informant for allotment of land on his Mukhbari information had been changing from time to time and informant was allowed concession of allotment of resumed land to the extent of his claim except the interregnum from 14-5-1964 to 25-2-1965

Concession for the allotment through memo. dated 25-2-1965 and S. 14 (1-A) of Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Amendment) Act(LV of 1973)was prospective in nature while substituted S. 14(2)(1-A) of Displaced Persons (Land

1985 SCMR 647 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 185(3)Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss. 10 & 11West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme, Para. 71 (A)Allotment of excess land

reformers seeking cancellation and re-allotment to them-During pendency of re-verification proceedings, petitioners filing belated appeal against original order of allotment

Informers given preference over petitioners

Order maintained in appeal

Leave to appeal refused by Supreme Court.

1983 SCMR 432 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 185(3) read with Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958) and West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme-Allotment of land to claimants from "agreed area" and "non-agreed area"-Leave to appeal-Granted to consider questions whether, 'for purposes of allotment of land, to a displaced person (a) a sitting allottee in a particular village is entitled to precedence over a claimant getting his claim transferred to such village and (b) a displaced person from an "agreed area" is entitled to precedence over one from "non agreed area".

1983 SCMR 40 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Para. 23-West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme having., been issued by Rehabilitation Commissioner under S. 6(1) of Pakistan Rehabilitation Act, 1956 and adopted for purposes of Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958 by virtue of S. 2(2) of such Act, Scheme, held, possesses statutory force.-[Interpretation of statutes]. - Para. 23 read with Memo. No. 4704-58/2919-R (P), dated 12-8-1958-Validity of orders-Challenge in writ jurisdiction-Orders passed palpably against instructions contained in Memorandum in question-Void ab initio and, held, rightly directed by High Court to be ignored-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 199 & 185(3).

1983 SCMR 1133 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Art. 185(3) read with Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss. 10 & 11 and West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme-Allotment of land-Leave to appeal-Granted to consider whether correct principle followed in calculating Produce Index Units.

1983 CLC 1492 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.6(1)

West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, para. 4-A (1) (ix)-Allotment of land to refugees from Jammu & Kashmir on guzara basis-Department allotting land to some other persons without cancelling previous allotment-Record showing that before passing order no notice was given to affected persons nor they were allowed any opportunity to be associated with proceedings not heard-Order passed without hearing affected persons clearly violative of principles of natural justice and will be of no effect on rights of such persons-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.

1982 CLC 1960 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Part II, para. 26, Correction Slip No. 2-P-1 dated 15th August, 1957 and No. 4-P-1 dated 19th January, 1962-Classification of land Petitioners allotees filing application before Additional Settlement Commissioner (respondent No. 2) agitating questions about classification of soil and category of land allotted to them-If Correction slip dated 15th August, 1957 already withdrawn and deemed never to have existed by virtue of correction slip dated 19th January, 1962-Held, in circumstances, question of correction slip dated 19th January, 1962 not having retrospective effect does not arise at all-Held further, concurrent decision of Additional Settlement Commissioner and Settlement Commissioner concluding land allotted to petitioners to be `cultivable flow' land cannot be upset at late stage.

1980 CLC 1898 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

S. 14 and West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme Allotment of land-One party claiming possession of land from 1960 while opposite-party claiming same from 1947-Additional Settlement Commissioner not taking into consideration date of allotment, factum of possession, Dhal receipts, Khasra Girdawari report, water share list or any other relevant document-Finding on question of possession by Additional Settlement Commissioner, held, arbitrary.

1979 PLD 844 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Read with West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme, para. 40Temporary allottee of land-Does not enjoy status of "tenant"-Such allottee cannot invoke M. L. R. 115 for protection of his possession.

1975 PLD 1419 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Para. 11-Both parties temporary allottees of evacuee agricultural land-Land available insufficient to meet claims of both parties - Rateable distribution of land between claimants-Only solution of problem-Jammu & Kashmir refugee claimants having verified claims in excess of area of temporary allotment-To be treated at par with other claimants and required to seek allotments elsewhere- Petitioners, held, could not, as a matter of right, claim preference over respondent in excess of their temporary allotment.

1973 PLD 215 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
No. 52, paras. 1, cls. (viii), 9(a) & 23 read with West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme No. 56, para. 4(a)

Provisions of para. 4(a), Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. 56-Not retrospective-Cannot operate retrospectively against allotments made earlier under Punjab Rehabilitation Scheme No. 52-Land allotted on temporary basis to Jammu and Kashmir refugees in lieu of maintenance-Not excluded from allotment under Punjab Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme No. 52-Allotment in lieu of maintenance to Jammu and Kashmir refugees-Not a "temporary allotment" in terms of para. I(viii) and hence does not enjoy benefit of para. 9(a) or 23 of Punjab Rehabilitation and Settlement Scheme No. 52.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3867

Precedents & Case Laws citing "West Pakistan Rehabilitation Scheme"

SCMR 1969
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 188 of 1968, decided on 23rd October 1968.

1969 S C M R 79

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus Mst. AZIZ BIBI‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1979
Writ Petition No. 1138 of 1977, decided on 1st March, 1978.

P L D 1979 Lahore 844

MUHAMMAD ABDULLA3f KHAN-Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, LYALLPUR-Respondent

Court: Land Reforms Regulation, 1972 M. L. R. 115
SCMR 1985
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 647 of 1981, decided on 15th September, 1981.

1985 S C M R 647

ABDULLAH and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (LAND) and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1975
Writ Petition No. 91‑R of 1971, decided on 20th February 1975.

P L D 1975 Lahore 904

ABDUL AZIZ AND 6 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), SARGODHA AND 8 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1966
8th February 1966

P L D 1966 (W

SATTAR‑Petitioner Versus (1) ABDUL GAFOOR,

Court: High Court
SCMR 1972
Civil Appeal No. 9‑P of 1971, decided on 23rd May 1972.

1972 S C M R 274

HABIB AHMAD AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND

Court: High Court
SCMR 1970
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 71 of 1970, decided on 13th April 1970.

1970 S C M R 546

GHULAM MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION

Court: High Court
SCMR 1987
Civil Appeal No.168 of 1976, decided on 9th December, 1986.

1987 S C M R 413

ZAFARULLAH KHAN and 5 others‑‑Appellants Versus MAQBOOL and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1973
Settlement Revision No. 273 of 1970, decided on 1st December 1971.

P L D 1973 Lahore 215

ALLAH DITTA AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus Raja SAEED AKHTAR‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1990
Civil Appeal No.246 of 1987, decided on 18th December, 1989.

1990 S C M R 817

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE and others — Appellants Versus THE BORDER AREA COMMITTEE, LAHORE and 10 others — ,Respondents

Court: (a) West Pakistan Border Area Regulation, 1959 C.M.LA.'s No.9-- ---Para.10---Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.185 (3)---Leave to appeal was granted to examine whether High Court had correctly by its judgment denied relief in the matter of restoration of allotment to claimant on mere suspicion that her verified claim was not genuine when on merits it was held that the Border Area Committee which had cancelled allotment from claimant's name had no jurisdiction over the land.