Discharge
Discharge legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioners were arrested for committing Qatl-i-amd and abduction who assailed their arrest warrants issued by Judicial Magistrate in same case in which they had already been discharged
Validity
Discharge order of petitioners was only amenable before Trial Court, which had taken cognizance of the case after submission of Challan
Judicial Magistrate was alien in all respects and did not have any jurisdiction to initially issue warrants of arrest and thereafter grant remand in police custody
Matter was already subjudice before Trial Court and Judicial Magistrate who issued warrants of arrest and thereafter granted remand of petitioners was not empowered to have passed any order in the matter
High Court set aside warrants of arrest and orders issued by Judicial Magistrate
Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.
"Discharge", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38693
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Discharge"
P L D 1959 (W
QASAM KHAN‑and others‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1960 (W
Mst. SAEEDA BEGUM AND OTHERS‑Accused‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1967 Dacca 459
ABDUR RAHIM AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Opposite‑Party
Court: High Court1994 P L C (C
ROSHAN ALI Versus THE ADDITIONAL I.‑G. POLICE, SINDH
Court: Service Tribunal SindhP L D 2001 Lahore 271
ASHIQ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus SESSIONS JUDGE, LODHRAN and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2001 Lahore 236
MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1999 P Cr
JAMEEL AHMED and 3 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RANGE
Court: LahoreP L D 1959 (W
MOHAMMAD AFZAL KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1961 (W
THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus YUSUF AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:2015 P Cr
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore