Home Maxims & Terms To Admit meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

To Admit

To Admit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 CLC 432 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
To admit" and "to verify" a factDistinction

Both such expressions are different having different meaning and connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "To Admit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/38888

Precedents & Case Laws citing "To Admit"

PTD 1966
Civil Miscellaneous Case No. 250 of 1949, decided on 4th February 1957.

1966 P T D 490

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, U. P. Versus MUKANDILAL HARBANSLAL

Court: Allahabad (India)
CLC 1998
Civil Revision Application No.122 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos.512 and 573 of 1992, decided on 1st September, 1994.

1998 C L C 1995

Dr. MUHAMMAD SALEEM KHAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus AMANULLAH KHAN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1996
Writ Petition No 3451 of 1982, heard on 26th November, 1995.

P L D 1996 Lahore 340

Sheikh MUKHTAR AHMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ and 2 others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: S. 115 & O.XIII, R. 2 ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑ Power of revision under S.115, ~.P.C.‑‑‑Scope ‑‑‑ Case decided ‑‑‑ Connotation ‑‑‑ Trial Court's refusal to admit. document'at belated stage, especially when same was not found to be relevant ‑‑‑ Acceptance of revision against such order‑‑Validity ‑‑‑ Any order admitting or declining to admit evidence oral or documentary, would not amount to "case decided" within meaning of S.115, C.P.C,‑Revision against Trial Court's judgment was, tlius, not competent and Revisional Court acted illegally in accepting the same through judgment in question ‑‑‑ Impugned judgment of Revisional Court was set aside in circumstances. ‑‑Words and phrases.
CLC 1981
Civil Revision No. 456 of 1977, heard on 15th September, 1980,

1981 C L C 987

Raji MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ ALI — ‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF AND 3 OTHERS — ‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Bail Application No. 1080 of 1985, decided on 6th November, 1985.

1986 P Cr

MUHAMMAD MOOSA‑‑Applicant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 2003
Writ Petition No. 4177 of 1995, decided on 5th June, 2002.

2003 C L C 185

MUHAMMAD YASIN and another ‑‑‑Petitioners Versus CIVIL JUDGE IST CLASS, KABIRWALA and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1992
Writ Petition No.2831 of 1991, decided on 22nd April, 1991.

1992 M L D 1368

BINYAMEEN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Sardar GHULAM FARID, DISTRICT JUDGE, KASUR‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1949
Privy Council Appeal No. 42 of 1947, decided on 6th December, 1949, from Lahore.

P L D 1949 Privy Council 270

KANDA and others-Appellants Versus WAGHU-Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1969
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 375 of 1967, decided on 12th October 1967.

1969 S C M R 965

Nawabzada Malik HABIBULLAH KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE PAK. CEMENT INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2000
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6744/BC of 1998, decided on 9th February, 1999.

2000 P Cr

NIAZ AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus KHALID NAWAZ and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore