1981 PLP 987 (CLC)
Raji MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ ALI — ‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF AND 3 OTHERS — ‑Respondents
| Citation | 1981 PLP 987 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Afzal Lone, J |
| Parties | Raji MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ ALI — ‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF AND 3 OTHERS — ‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 987 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 987 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Afzal Lone, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 987 (CLC) (Raji MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ ALI — ‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF AND 3 OTHERS — ‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Sh. Ata Ullah Quershi and Asad Ali Khan for Petitioners.
- Mian M. Zafar Yasin for Respondents .
- Date of hearing : 15th September, 1981.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ O. XIV, r. 5 & O. XII, r. 4‑‑Subsequent events after filing of suit‑Not" of‑Pre‑emptor seeking amendment of his plaint by reduction of price of land as given in plaint on ground of vendee having cut and removed from land in suit trees worth a certain amount after institution of suit‑‑Court disallowing application Pre‑emptor not challenging such order but applying for framing additional issue and for issuing notice to vendee to admit fact of cutting trees and value thereof‑Trial Court, held, not wrong in declining to frame' additional issue in such circumstances‑Court, however, held further, competent to take notice of subsequent events after institution of suit and pre‑emptor could be allowed to serve notice on adversary to admit facts.‑[ Pre‑emption].
Judgment & Decree
‑Respondents Civil Revision No. 456 of 1977, heard on 15th September, 1980, ‑‑ O. XIV, r. 5 & O. XII, r. 4‑‑Subsequent events after filing of suit‑Not" of‑Pre‑emptor seeking amendment of his plaint by reduction of price of land as given in plaint on ground of vendee having cut and removed from land in suit trees worth a certain amount after institution of suit‑‑Court disallowing application Pre‑emptor not challenging such order but applying for framing additional issue and for issuing notice to vendee to admit fact of cutting trees and value thereof‑Trial Court, held, not wrong in declining to frame' additional issue in such circumstances‑Court, however, held further, competent to take notice of subsequent events after institution of suit and pre‑emptor could be allowed to serve notice on adversary to admit facts.‑[ Pre‑emption]. Sh. Ata Ullah Quershi and Asad Ali Khan for Petitioners. Mian M. Zafar Yasin for Respondents . Date of hearing : 15th September, 1981.