Home Maxims & Terms Lex Fori meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Lex Fori

Lex Fori legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 YLR 2503 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Lex fori

Definition of.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Lex Fori", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/39031

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Lex Fori"

PLD 2015
2015-January-29

P L D 2015 Sindh 341

GENESIS AVIATION SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. — Plaintiff Versus GULF AIR COMPANY G.S.C. — Defendant

Court: High Court
MLD 2023
merit to the extent of sentence of fine---High Court returned record and case property to Trial Court as appeal stood abated as per S. 431, Cr.P.C.---Appeal abated, in circumstances

2023 M L D 1983

KHUDA BAKHSH and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLD 1993
Civil Appeal No.167‑K of 1989, decided on 9th December, i991

P L D 1993 Supreme Court 88

ATLANTIC STEAMER'S SUPPLY COMPANY ‑Appellant Versus m.v. TITISEE and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: ‑‑"Maritime lien"‑‑‑Definition ‑‑‑ Maritime lien means legal proceedings in an appropriate form to have the ship seized by the officers of the Court and made available by sale if not released on bail ‑‑‑ Proceedings so initiated are called action in rem against res‑‑‑Word "res" in the legal parlance in context of an admiralty action connotes a limited number of things such as ships and their cargoes and freights.‑‑Words and phrases.
CLC 2000
Writ Petition No. 1292 of 2000, decided on 21st April, 2000.

2000 C L C 1405

T. ZUBAIR LIMITED and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus JUDGE, BANKING COURT NO.III, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2013
2012-July-30

2013 C L D 362

F.T. SELNES — Appellant Versus MEGA INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLD 2014
2014-April-15

P L D 2014 Sindh 349

ABDULLAH — Plaintiff Versus Messrs CNAN GROUP SPA through Chief Executive/Managing Director and another — Defendants

Court: High Court
PLD 1955
Suit No. 688 of 1953. Application under O. XI rule 12 Civil Procedure Code decided on 28th January, 1955.

P L D 1955 Sind 309

Messrs. A. R. MUHAMMAD SIDDIK‑Plaintiffs Versus Messrs. THE SOUTH BRITISH INSURANCE

Court: Discovery was refused. pp. 312 to 319 A to K
PLD 1952
16th October 1952

P L D 1952 Sind 64

DR. TILLUMAL‑Plaintiff Versus Seth ABDULLAH and another‑Defendants

Court: High Court
SCMR 1997
N/A

1997SCMR323

SHAHRAH‑E‑KAMAL ATATURK, KARACHI‑‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL MALIK BADRUDDIN‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 1991
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No.542 of 1990, decided on 6th December, 1990.

1991 S C M R 681

MASOOD AHMAD MALIK — Petitioner Versus Mst. FOUZIA FARHANA QUDDUS and others — Respondents

Court: High Court