Existing laws
Existing laws legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
"Existing laws", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3962
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Existing laws"
P L D 2003 Lahore 531
Messrs FECTO CEMENT LTD. ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1985 Lahore 358
ZAH00R MAHMOOD FAROOQI — Petitioner Versus THE PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, LAHORE Respondent
Court: --Art. 9-Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance (XXXII of 1962), S. 33(2)(d)-Punjab Health Department (Medical and Dental Teaching Posts) Service Rules, 1979-Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1970, S. 23-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 268(7), 142 & 143-Regulations published by a Federal Authority and Rules promulgated by Provincial Government = Question whether two standing provisions of viz. Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962, S. 33 and Punjab Health Department (Medical and Dental Teaching Posts) Service Rules, 1979 could co-exist-Federal law, held, prevailed, and provincial law to the extent of repugnancy was void -Two competing laws when enact two divergent provisions, Federal law must prevail -Two provisions when entirely irreconcilable, repugnancy could be deemed to exist-- New law when abridges some right conferred by existing law or directly or indirectly interfered with such right, repugnancy could be said to be in existence-Regulations framed by Federal Government being existing law must take precedence over Rules of Provincial Government, therefore, Rules 1979 must give way to Regulations 1962-Irreconcitable conflict and repugnancy-Principles to be applied.-Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1963 Supreme Court 401
MUHAMMAD AFZAL‑Appellant Versus (1) THE COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION AND
Court: Martial Law Order (M. L. A. Zone B) No. 111 (regarding removal of timber and bamboo shops from their respective sites in Lahore to a specified market)‑Martial Law Order (M. L. A. Zone B) No. 118 (regarding removal of cows and buffaloes from limits of Lahore Municipal Committee)‑West Pakistan Martial Law Orders (Continuance in Force) Ordinance (XXI of 1962)‑Martial Law Orders Nos. 111 and 118, held to be incompetent "to extent of repugnancy to existing laws" by reason of provision of Arts. 2 (1) and 4 (1), Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (1 of 1958)‑Court's power to pronounce upon competence of aforesaid Martial Law Orders not affected by Art. 3, Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (I of 1958) or by Art. 250, Constitution of Pakistan (1962), or by cl. 3, Martial Law Orders (Repeal) Order (29 of 1962)‑Martial Law (Pending Proceedings and Protection) Order (26 of 1962) not applicable to "executive action proposed to be taken"‑Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (I of 1958), "fundamental law of country and instrument of constitutional nature"‑Muhammad Ayub Khuhro v. Pakistan and others P L D 1960 S C (Pak) 237; State v. Dosso and another P L D 1958 S C (Pak) 533 and Iftikhar‑ud‑Din and another v. Muhammad Sarfraz and another P L D 1961 S C (Pak.) 585 ref.‑West Pakistan Martial Law Orders (Continuance in Force) Ordinance (XXI of 1962), an "existing law" within meaning of Art. 225(7), Constitution of Pakistan (1962) (Per Hamoodur Rahman, J. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle‑Akbar, JJ., being signatories to Judgment; Kaikaus, J. contra)‑Ordinance held to be "in force" "immediately before commencing day" though it was not "in operation" (Per Hamoodur Rahman, J., Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle‑Akbar, JJ., being signatories to judgment ; Kaikaus, J. contra)‑Province of East Pakistan v. Md. Mehdi Ali Khan and others P L D 1959 S C (Pak.) 387 ref. Ordi nance, however, not competently or validly made" under Art. 5, Laws (Continuance in Force) Order (I of 1958)‑Martial Law Orders Nos. Ill, 118 not validly continued by Ordinance (XXI of 1962) Court's power to pronounce upon competence of Ordinance not taken away by Arts. 6 and 7, Constitution of Pakistan (1962)‑Ordinance repugnant to certain existing laws‑Per Kaikaus, J. : "a law comes into force only when it takes effect or comes into operation..1982 P L C 161
Syed ABID ALI SHAH AND 2 OTHERS Versus THE CHAIRMAN SIND ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND 2 OTHERS
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal, Sind2021 P L C 157
Messrs SHAHBAZ GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Labour and Human Resource Department, Karachi and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2021 P L C 157
Messrs SHAHBAZ GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Labour and Human Resource Department, Karachi and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2021 S C M R 1088
Messrs SHAHBAZ GARMENTS (PVT.) LTD. and others — Appellants Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Labour and Human Resource Department, Karachiand others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1993 P Cr
MUHAMMAD NISAR KHAN and 2 others — Appellants Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 2008 Islamabad 30
Messrs FECTO CEMENT LIMITED, SANGJANI, ISLAMABAD — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Water and Power, Islamabad and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2001 Supreme Court 18
Haji Rana MUHAMMAD SHABBIR AHMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Attorney-General for Pakistan and another — Respondents
Court: High Court