MLD 1988

1988 PLP 1809 (MLD)

MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Lahore
Decided Date
decided on 3rd February, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Afrasiab Khan, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1988 PLP 1809 (MLD)
Forum / Court Lahore
Bench Members Afrasiab Khan, J
Parties MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1809 (MLD)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1809 (MLD)?

The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Afrasiab Khan, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1809 (MLD) (MUHAMMAD ABBAS‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑S.382‑B‑‑Sentence, commutation of‑‑Period of about 2 years for which accused convict served as undertrial prisoner allowed to be deducted from sentence awarded to him. Munir Ahmad Bhatti for Applicant. Najmuz Zaman, Assistant A: G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

The applicant Muhammad Abbas has moved this application under section 561‑A, Cr.P.C. praying therein that the period for which he has served as under trial prisoner with effect from 20‑8‑1978 to 4‑8‑1980, be considered and deducted from the sentence awarded to him.

2. A notice of the application was sent to the State and in compliance thereof, Mr. Najamuz Zaman, learned Assistant Advocate‑General is present. He submitted that concession of section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. can be allowed and there is no legal bar in the way of allowing such a concession to the applicant. It may be observed that when the main Criminal Appeal was heard and disposed of vide my judgment dated 22‑2-1987, no such request on behalf of the applicant was made. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have perused the record. Accordingly, the above Criminal Miscellaneous is allowed and direction is issued , to the Jail authorities to give the benefit of section 382‑B, Cr.P.C. to the a applicant. S.G.D./M‑568/1 Order accordingly.