P L D 1972 Rev (PLP)
NAWAB KHAN &ND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH AND ANOTHER
| Citation | P L D 1972 Rev (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Punjab |
| Bench Members | Single Bench |
| Parties | NAWAB KHAN &ND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH AND ANOTHER |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1972 Rev (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1972 Rev (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Punjab bench comprising: Honorable Judges.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1972 Rev (PLP) (NAWAB KHAN &ND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH AND ANOTHER). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Rana Abdur Rahim Khan for Petitioners.
- Sultan Ahmad for Respondent No. 1.
Headnotes / Summary
Rent recovered in respect of area coot in possession of allottee‑Directed to be adjusted against payments for area already in his possession. Respondent No. 2 in person. Karam Hussain Colony Clerk and Patwari Halqa with Record.
Judgment & Decree
11 8‑00 12 West 4‑00 19 West 4‑00 20 8‑00 2 1 8‑00 22 West 6‑00 _____________ Total Area 61‑00 _____________ The area in square No. 72 is reported by the Patwari to be mostly Banjar and only in Kharif 1970 the lessee had grown some khar which is a product of Banjar land without much effort. In lieu of the area to be surrendered by Manzoor Ahmad lessee the Patwari has suggested allotment of 61 kanals 4 marlas from square No. 17 noted below :‑ Square No. Killa No. Area 17 1 8‑00 2 8‑00 3 7‑16 8 5‑8 9 8‑00 10 8‑00 11 8‑00 12 8‑00 The Patwari has also reported that the remaining area in square No. 17 is proprietary land of the father of Manzoor Ahmad lessee. If Manzoor Ahmad is shifted from part of Square No. 72 to part of Square No. 17 he will be getting near his father's land. This proposal of compensating Mohammad Abdullah etc. respondents by allotment of part of Square No. 72 and compensating Manzoor Ahmad lessee by allotment of part of Square No. 17 should be examined by the D. C. Collector after verification by the field staff at the spot.
5. Mohammad Abdullah respondent has also complained that he has been required to pay rent for the area in dispute which has not been in his possession. In view of the fact that the res pondents have not enjoyed possession of the area in dispute, the rent for it should be deducted and adjusted against payments for area already in their possession and from the harvest they are given an equivalent area in lieu of the area in dispute they may be required to pay the usual rent.
6. The revision petition is therefore decided as above. Orders may be issued and parties may be informed accordingly. Order accordingly.