1985 P (PLP)
Before Muhammad Zafarullah, J Versus The STATE‑‑Respondent
| Citation | 1985 P (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Zafarullah, J |
| Parties | Before Muhammad Zafarullah, J Versus The STATE‑‑Respondent |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1985 P (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1985 P (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Zafarullah, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1985 P (PLP) (Before Muhammad Zafarullah, J Versus The STATE‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Petitioners having a motive and specific role for murder of deceased attributed to them‑‑Mere fact that location of an injury attributed to one of petitioners not same as stated by complainant in F.I.R., held, not of much consequence Bail declined, in circumstances. Malik Allah Yar Mahay for the Petitioners. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for the State.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑‑ ‑‑‑S.497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.302‑‑Petitioners having a motive and specific role for murder of deceased attributed to them‑‑Mere fact that location of an injury attributed to one of petitioners not same as stated by complainant in F.I.R., held, not of much consequence Bail declined, in circumstances. Malik Allah Yar Mahay for the Petitioners. Altaf Ibrahim Qureshi for the State. Subhan and Ramzan petitioners are attributed specific role for the murder of Wahid Bakhsh deceased. The learned counsel however, submits that the location of injury attributed to Subhan is not the same as stated by the complainant in the F.I.R. This, however, is not of much consequence as there is allegation of motive against Subhan. The deceased was said to be carrying on with a sister of Subhan petitioner. Ramzan the other petitioner is attributed an injury on the head of the deceased. The petition for bail is dismissed. S.G.D Bail declined.