2010 PLP 325 (GBLR)
GHULAM QADIR — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ABBAS and another — Respondents
| Citation | 2010 PLP 325 (GBLR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Appellate Court |
| Bench Members | Syed Jaffar Shah and Muhammad Yaqoob, JJ |
| Parties | GHULAM QADIR — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ABBAS and another — Respondents |
| Primary Law | Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2010 PLP 325 (GBLR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Gilgit-Baltistan (Empowerment and Self-Governance) Order, 2009 as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2010 PLP 325 (GBLR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Appellate Court bench comprising: Syed Jaffar Shah and Muhammad Yaqoob, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2010 PLP 325 (GBLR) (GHULAM QADIR — Petitioner Versus GHULAM ABBAS and another — Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Haji Jamal Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
Art. 65
Gilgit-Baltistan Supreme Appellate Court Rules, 2008, O.XXVII
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.114 & O.XLVII, R.1
Review of Supreme Appellate Court judgment
Petitioner had sought, review of judgment, whereby court while maintaining the judgment of Chief Court had dismissed petition for leave to appeal
Points raised by the counsel for the petitioner had already been discussed and dilated upon in the impugned judgment in a comprehensive manner
Counsel for the petitioner could not point out any mistake or error on the face of record for review of the impugned judgment
Petition for review was dismissed.
Judgment & Decree
The petitioner through this petition seeks review of our judgment, dated 31-3-2010 in C.P.L.A. No.13 of 2009 whereby this Court while maintaining the judgment of Chief Court had dismissed the above C.P.L.A. Heard and perused the record. Points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner have already been discussed and dilated upon in the impugned judgment in a comprehensive manner. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any mistake or error on the face of record for review of the impugned judgment. Consequently we dismiss this petition. H.B.T./63/Glt. Petition dismissed.