1981 PLP 456 (CLC)
HAYAT ALI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus GHAZAN (REPRENENTED BY HIS HEIRS)‑Respondent
| Citation | 1981 PLP 456 (CLC) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Ilyas, J |
| Parties | HAYAT ALI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus GHAZAN (REPRENENTED BY HIS HEIRS)‑Respondent |
| Primary Law | Pre‑emption‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1981 PLP 456 (CLC)?
This judgment primarily cites: Pre‑emption‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1981 PLP 456 (CLC)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Muhammad Ilyas, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1981 PLP 456 (CLC) (HAYAT ALI AND ANOTHER‑Appellants Versus GHAZAN (REPRENENTED BY HIS HEIRS)‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Raja Said Akbar Khan for Appellants.
- Sultan Khan for Respondent.
- Date of hearing : 8th July 1980.
Headnotes / Summary
‑‑ Sale‑Gift‑Court can, in appropriate cases, treat a gift as a sale even though actual passing of consideration not proved.‑[Gift]. Chiragh Din v. Allah Din and another 70 P R 1916 ; Haji Said Muhammad Karam Shah v. Noor Ilahi Khan and another P L D 1962 Pesh. 44 and Tara Chand v. Baldeo and others 117 P R 1890 fol. Ali Muhammad v. Malik Sanwal and others P L D 1961 Pesh. 62 distinguished.
Judgment & Decree
Regular Second Appeal No. 609 of 1966, heard on 8th July, 1980. ‑‑ Sale‑Gift‑Court can, in appropriate cases, treat a gift as a sale even though actual passing of consideration not proved.‑[Gift]. Chiragh Din v. Allah Din and another 70 P R 1916 ; Haji Said Muhammad Karam Shah v. Noor Ilahi Khan and another P L D 1962 Pesh. 44 and Tara Chand v. Baldeo and others 117 P R 1890 fol. Ali Muhammad v. Malik Sanwal and others P L D 1961 Pesh. 62 distinguished. Raja Said Akbar Khan for Appellants. Sultan Khan for Respondent. Date of hearing : 8th July 1980.