SCMR 1989

1989 PLP 1943 (SCMR)

COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, LAHORE Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Petition No.1018 of 1981, decided on 12th July, 1988.
Honorable Judges
Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1989 PLP 1943 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ
Parties COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, LAHORE Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR Respondent
Primary Law Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1989 PLP 1943 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1989 PLP 1943 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1989 PLP 1943 (SCMR) (COMMUNICATIONS AND WORKS DEPARTMENT, LAHORE Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)‑‑‑

Representation

  • S.M. Zubair, Additional Advocate‑General and M.A. Abdullah Bajwa, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ali Sheikh, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
  • Nemo for Respondent.
  • Date of hearing: 12th July, 1988.

Headnotes / Summary

(From the judgment of Punjab Service Tribunal dated 23‑8‑1981 in Appeal No.433/728 of 1980) ‑‑‑S.4‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)‑‑Service Tribunal exercised its discretion after taking all the relevant facts into consideration‑‑Judgment of Tribunal as such called for no interference‑‑Leave to appeal refused.

Judgment & Decree

GHULAM MUJADDID, J.‑‑Secretary to Government of Punjab, Communications and Works Department, Lahore, has impugned the judgment of the Punjab Service Tribunal dated 23‑8‑1981 by means of this petition for leave to appeal. The Tribunal exercised its discretion after taking all the relevant facts into consideration and the judgment as such calls for no interference. Leave is declined. Dismissed. M.A.K./S‑410/S Leave refused