1988 PLP 1689 (SCMR)
ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus TINE FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF
| Citation | 1988 PLP 1689 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | ---Art.13-A(-b)--Constitution. of Pakistan (1973), A.rt.212(3)- Abatement of .proceedings in Supreme Court--Dismissal from service under Martial Law Regulation No.58 challenged--During pendency of petitions for leave to appeal C.H,L.A. 'Order .No.3 of 1982 was promulgated by operation of which petitions stood abated and disposed of --Abatement. |
| Bench Members | Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ |
| Parties | ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus TINE FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1988 PLP 1689 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1988 PLP 1689 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the ---Art.13-A(-b)--Constitution. of Pakistan (1973), A.rt.212(3)- Abatement of .proceedings in Supreme Court--Dismissal from service under Martial Law Regulation No.58 challenged--During pendency of petitions for leave to appeal C.H,L.A. 'Order .No.3 of 1982 was promulgated by operation of which petitions stood abated and disposed of --Abatement. bench comprising: Ghulam Mujaddid Mirza and Saad Saood Jan, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1988 PLP 1689 (SCMR) (ABDUL RASHID — Petitioner Versus TINE FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Representation
- Ch.Mushtaq Masood, Advocate Supreme Court and Sh.Masud Akhtar, Advocate‑ on‑Record for Petitioner (in Civil Petition No.427 of 1981).
- Nemo for Respondents (in Civil Petition No.427 of 1981).
- Wilayat Umar Chaudhry, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner (in Civil Petition No.458 of 1981).
- Nemo for Respondents (in Civil Petition No.458 of 1981).
- Abdul Ghaffar Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Advocate‑ on‑Record (in Civil Petition No.544 of 1981).
- Nemo for Respondents (in Civil Petition No.544 of 1981).
Judgment & Decree
SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.‑‑The petitioners in these petitions were dismissed from service under Martial Law Regulation No.58 on different dates in 1970. They preferred appeals before the Service Tribunal which after examining the merit rejected them. They then filed petitions for special leave to appeal in this Court. While their petitions were pending the Chief Martial Law Administrator's Order No.3 of 198 was promulgated. The Order introduced Article 13‑A in the Provisional Constitution Order. By operation of this Article, these petitions stood abated. See Hidayatullah v. Federation of Pakistan 1986 S C M R
803. As these petitions have abated, they are disposed of accordingly. M.I./A‑273/S Order accordingly.