Register
PLD 1949

P (PLP)

Seth MUSAJI-Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus ABDUL AZIZ and another-Defendants-Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Revision No. 1 of 1919, decided on 13th May 1949, under section 33 of the British Baluchistan Courts Regulation read with section 115 of the Civil Procedure Code
Honorable Judges
Bacon, J. C.
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P (PLP)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Bacon, J. C.
Parties Seth MUSAJI-Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus ABDUL AZIZ and another-Defendants-Respondents
Primary Law Mere production of a lease deed is not satisfactory proof of rent in cases of this nature. Besides proving the genuineness of the lease deed in a proper legal manner the petitioner should also be required to 'establish beyond doubt that he actually received the amount of rent specified in the rent deed., Baluchistan Rent Control Regulation, 1945-Fixing standard rent-Mere production of lease deed not satisfactory proof of rent--- Genuineness of deed and actual receipt of rent should also be established.
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Mere production of a lease deed is not satisfactory proof of rent in cases of this nature. Besides proving the genuineness of the lease deed in a proper legal manner the petitioner should also be required to 'establish beyond doubt that he actually received the amount of rent specified in the rent deed., Baluchistan Rent Control Regulation, 1945-Fixing standard rent-Mere production of lease deed not satisfactory proof of rent--- Genuineness of deed and actual receipt of rent should also be established. as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Bacon, J. C..

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P (PLP) (Seth MUSAJI-Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus ABDUL AZIZ and another-Defendants-Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Mere production of a lease deed is not satisfactory proof of rent in cases of this nature. Besides proving the genuineness of the lease deed in a proper legal manner the petitioner should also be required to 'establish beyond doubt that he actually received the amount of rent specified in the rent deed. Baluchistan Rent Control Regulation, 1945-Fixing standard rent-Mere production of lease deed not satisfactory proof of rent--- Genuineness of deed and actual receipt of rent should also be established.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PLD
  • Volume Year: 1949
  • Citation Ref: P (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • P HARIRAM KHIARANI, A FIRM‑Applicants Versus GOBINDRAM RATTAN CHAND, A FIRM‑Opponents
  • P MULCHAND UDHOOMAL‑Appellant Versus BHERUMAL KANOMAL and others‑Respondents
  • P MOOR MUHAMMAD, WALI MUHAMMAD‑Appellants Versus DHIRA SINGH-JAGAT SINGH and others‑Respondents
  • P RAHMATULLA‑ Plaintiff Versus MAQBOOL ALAM‑Defendant
  • P HASSOMAL-TILLUMAL‑Applicant Versus GHULAM NABI SHAH‑Respondent
  • P GHULAM MUHAMMAD KHAN Applicant Versus THE CROWN‑ Opponent