Register
PCRLJ 1984

1984 P Cr (PLP)

MEENHON AND ANOTHER-Applicant's Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Karachi
Decided Date
Criminal Bail Application No. 489 of 1984, decided on 20th June, 1984
Honorable Judges
Abdul Razak A. Thahim, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1984 P Cr (PLP)
Forum / Court Karachi
Bench Members Abdul Razak A. Thahim, J
Parties MEENHON AND ANOTHER-Applicant's Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Primary Law Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 P Cr (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 P Cr (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the Karachi bench comprising: Abdul Razak A. Thahim, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 P Cr (PLP) (MEENHON AND ANOTHER-Applicant's Versus THE STATE-Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Headnotes / Summary

S. 497-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Bail, grant of Applicants contending disputed survey numbers as belonging to them and as such having every right to defend their property against encroachers and further fight being sudden they having no intention whatsoever to commit murder-Bail allowed, in circumstances. 1983 P Cr. L J 1395 ; Ahmed and others v. The State 1983 P Cr. L J 1266 ; 1983 P Cr. L J 395 ; Amir v.The State P L D 1972 S C 277 and Muhammad Aslam and 5 others v. The State 1975 P Cr. L 1 125 ref. Abdul mujeeb Pirzada for Applicants. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Asstt. A.-G. for the State.

Judgment & Decree

THE STATE-Respondent Criminal Bail Application No. 489 of 1984, decided on 20th June, 1984

S. 497-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302-Bail, grant of Applicants contending disputed survey numbers as belonging to them and as such having every right to defend their property against encroachers and further fight being sudden they having no intention whatsoever to commit murder-Bail allowed, in circumstances. 1983 P Cr. L J 1395 ; Ahmed and others v. The State 1983 P Cr. L J 1266 ; 1983 P Cr. L J 395 ; Amir v.The State P L D 1972 S C 277 and Muhammad Aslam and 5 others v. The State 1975 P Cr. L 1 125 ref. Abdul mujeeb Pirzada for Applicants. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Asstt. A.-G. for the State.

Legal Tools

Metadata Directory

  • Journal: PCRLJ
  • Volume Year: 1984
  • Citation Ref: 1984 P Cr (PLP)

Cite & Link (Backlink Generator)

Are you writing a blog or referencing this case? Copy the optimized HTML link below to cite this judgment on your website and create a legal backlink:

HTML Backlink Code:
Text Citation:

Related Judgments

  • 1984 P Cr MUHAMMAD LATIF AND 3 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent
  • 1984 P Cr MUHAMMAD RASHID AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Respondent
  • 1984 P Cr MUHAMMAD SALEEM-Appellant Versus MUKHTAR KHAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents
  • 1984 P Cr TARIQ MAHMOOD AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus THE STATE-Non-petitioner
  • 1984 P Cr MUHAMMAD SHARI F-Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
  • 1984 P Cr TAHIR-UR-REHMAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Non-petitioner