PLD 1975

P L D 1975 Karachi 719 (PLP)

KARACHI SHIPYARDS AND ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., KARACHI — Petitioners Versus SECOND SIND LABOUR COURT AND 2 OTHERS — ­Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
Decided Date
Constitutional Petition No. 815 of 1974, decided on 19th May 1975.
Honorable Judges
Zakaullah Lodhi, J
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation P L D 1975 Karachi 719 (PLP)
Forum / Court
Bench Members Zakaullah Lodhi, J
Parties KARACHI SHIPYARDS AND ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., KARACHI — Petitioners Versus SECOND SIND LABOUR COURT AND 2 OTHERS — ­Respondents
Primary Law (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), (a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1975 Karachi 719 (PLP)?

This judgment primarily cites: (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), (a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1975 Karachi 719 (PLP)?

The case was heard and decided by the bench comprising: Zakaullah Lodhi, J.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1975 Karachi 719 (PLP) (KARACHI SHIPYARDS AND ENGINEERING WORKS LTD., KARACHI — Petitioners Versus SECOND SIND LABOUR COURT AND 2 OTHERS — ­Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

(b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969) (a) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)

Representation

  • Nizam Ahmed for Petitioner.
  • Malik M. Sayeed for Respondent No. 3.
  • Date of hearing : 12th May 1975.

Headnotes / Summary

S. 25-A-Individual grievance, redress of-Contention that griev­ance procedure laid down in subsections (1) to (4) of S. 25-A has to be followed in cases other than those relating to removal from service-Held, not correct-Workers, whose services have been terminat­ed-Bound to follow such procedure. -- S. 25-A-Individual grievance, redress of-Appeal-Limitation--­Employee submitting appeal to employer for re-instatement and such appeal considered as grievance notice by Labour Court-Finding of fact of Labour Court on point of treating appeal as grievance notice--­Not expedient to interfere with in writ jurisdiction-Appeal being treated as grievance notice, appeal before Junior Labour Court, held, not time-barred and also in compliance with procedure laid down in subsections (1) to (4) of S. 25-A. Muhammad Hussain Muneer v. Sikander Amir and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref.

Judgment & Decree

‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Individual grievance, redress of‑Contention that griev ance procedure laid down in subsections (1) to (4) of S. 25‑A has to be followed in cases other than those relating to removal from serviceHeld, not correct‑Workers, whose services have been terminat ed‑Bound to follow such procedure. (b) Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969)‑‑ ‑‑ S. 25‑A‑Individual grievance, redress ofAppealLimitation-- Employee submitting appeal to employer for re‑instatement and such appeal considered as grievance notice by Labour CourtFinding of fact of Labour Court on point of treating appeal as grievance notice-- Not expedient to interfere with in writ jurisdictionAppeal being treated as grievance notice, appeal before Junior Labour Court, held, not time‑barred and also in compliance with procedure laid down in subsections (1) to (4) of S. 25‑A. Muhammad Hussain Muneer v. Sikander Amir and others P L D 1974 S C 139 ref. Nizam Ahmed for Petitioner. Malik M. Sayeed for Respondent No.

3. Date of hearing : 12th May 1975.