SCMR 1986

1986 PLP 43 (SCMR)

QUTABUDDIN‑‑Petitioner Versus SANAULLAH and others‑‑Respondents

Jurisdiction / Court
High Court
Decided Date
Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 345‑R of 1985 in Civil Appeal No. 199 of 1983, decided on 13th October, 1985.
Honorable Judges
Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1986 PLP 43 (SCMR)
Forum / Court High Court
Bench Members Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ
Parties QUTABUDDIN‑‑Petitioner Versus SANAULLAH and others‑‑Respondents
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 43 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 43 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Mian Burhanuddin Khan, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 43 (SCMR) (QUTABUDDIN‑‑Petitioner Versus SANAULLAH and others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑

Representation

  • ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Counsel for appellant stating that since appellant has obtained possession of disputed premises his appeal has become infructuous‑‑Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
  • Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l.

Judgment & Decree

Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 345‑R of 1985 in Civil Appeal No. 199 of 1983, decided on 13th October, 1985. ‑‑‑Art. 185(3)‑‑Counsel for appellant stating that since appellant has obtained possession of disputed premises his appeal has become infructuous‑‑Appeal dismissed as infructuous. Ch. Muhammad Aslam, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent No.l. SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.‑‑Learned counsel for the appellant has filed an application stating therein that this appeal has become infructuous as he has obtained the possession of disputed premises. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. M. Y. H. Appeal dismissed.