1998 PLP 577 (SCMR)
Ch. SAEED AHMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 2 others‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 1998 PLP 577 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J. and Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, J |
| Parties | Ch. SAEED AHMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 2 others‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1998 PLP 577 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1998 PLP 577 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Sajjad Ali Shah, C. J. and Muhammad Bashir Jehangiri, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1998 PLP 577 (SCMR) (Ch. SAEED AHMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance and 2 others‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 10th December, 1995.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the order of the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dated 1.6‑7‑1995 passed in Appeal No. 472‑R of 1994). ‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Adverse remarks in Annual Confidential Report ‑‑‑Validity‑‑ Leave to appeal was granted to, consider whether Service Tribunal was justified in maintaining adverse remarks in question, in spite of the fact that civil servant had brought on record some material to indicate that Reporting and Countersigning Officers particularly former officer had some personal reasons which might have prompted him to record such adverse remarks and also keeping in view that performance of civil servant during specified period had been commended inasmuch as his work during that period had been appreciated by his superiors. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD BASHIR JEHANGIRI, J.‑‑‑The petitioner has sought leave to appeal against the order of dismissal of his appeal, by ,the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, dated 16‑7‑1995.
2. The petitioner was given adverse remarks for the period from 1‑1‑1990 to I1‑8‑1990 by his Reporting Officer which were countersigned by the Countersigning Officer. The adverse remarks in respect of the above period were conveyed to the petitioner after about six months of the period prescribed therefore The adverse remarks were challenged before the Federal Service Tribunal because of the personal grudge and biased attitude of respondent No.2 and further that the petitioner had already applied to the Finance Division that his A.C.R. for 1990 should not be allowed to be initiated/countersigned by respondent No.2 because he had already spoiled the A.C.Rs. of the petitioner for the years 1988‑89; and that the performance of the petitioner had throughout been held as excellent.
3. We have heard the petitioner in person and have perused the record. Leave to appeal is granted to consider whether the Tribunal was justified in maintaining the adverse remarks, in question in spite of the fact, that the petitioner had brought on the record some material to indicate that the Reporting and Countersigning Officers particularly Mr. Mansoor Alam Aqil had some personal reasons which might have prompted him to record the above adverse remarks and also keeping in view that the performance of the petitioner during the above period had been commended inasmuch as his work during that period had been appreciated by his superiors. A.A./S‑1063/S Leave granted.