P L D 1979 Karachi 444 (PLP)
Plaintiff Versus MESSRS AIRPORTS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD.‑‑
| Citation | P L D 1979 Karachi 444 (PLP) |
| Forum / Court | ‑‑ S. 34‑Stay of proceedings‑Applicant‑defendant not ready and willing to go to arbitration at time plaintiff filed suit‑Held, one of essential conditions provided in S. 34 for stay of proceedings, not fulfilled by defendant‑Application dismissed.‑Stay of proceedings. |
| Bench Members | Naimuddin, J |
| Parties | Plaintiff Versus MESSRS AIRPORTS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD.‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in P L D 1979 Karachi 444 (PLP)?
This judgment primarily cites: statutory provisions as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case P L D 1979 Karachi 444 (PLP)?
The case was heard and decided by the ‑‑ S. 34‑Stay of proceedings‑Applicant‑defendant not ready and willing to go to arbitration at time plaintiff filed suit‑Held, one of essential conditions provided in S. 34 for stay of proceedings, not fulfilled by defendant‑Application dismissed.‑Stay of proceedings. bench comprising: Naimuddin, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: P L D 1979 Karachi 444 (PLP) (Plaintiff Versus MESSRS AIRPORTS DEVELOPMENT AGENCY LTD.‑‑). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Headnotes / Summary
Arbitration Act (x of 1940)‑‑ ‑‑ S. 34‑Stay of proceedings‑Applicant‑defendant not ready and willing to go to arbitration at time plaintiff filed suit‑Held, one of essential conditions provided in S. 34 for stay of proceedings, not fulfilled by defendant‑Application dismissed.‑[Stay of proceedings]. India Steel & Wire Products Ltd. v. Pt. Debi Prasad Malaviya A I R 1944 All. 253 and Messrs Gabole Brothers v. Government of Pakistan P L D 1972 Kar. 515 distinguished. Nasim Faruqui for Plaintiffs. Saeed A. Shaikh, Standing Counsel for Defendants.
Judgment & Decree
Defendant Suit No. 677 of 1977, decided on 10th October 1978. Arbitration Act (x of 1940)‑‑ ‑‑ S. 34‑Stay of proceedings‑Applicant‑defendant not ready and willing to go to arbitration at time plaintiff filed suit‑Held, one of essential conditions provided in S. 34 for stay of proceedings, not fulfilled by defendant‑Application dismissed.‑[Stay of proceedings]. India Steel & Wire Products Ltd. v. Pt. Debi Prasad Malaviya A I R 1944 All. 253 and Messrs Gabole Brothers v. Government of Pakistan P L D 1972 Kar. 515 distinguished. Nasim Faruqui for Plaintiffs. Saeed A. Shaikh, Standing Counsel for Defendants.