1984 PLP 177 (SCMR)
Qazi SARDAR BAHADAR-Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MIN1STRY OF HEALTH, ISLAMABAD, AND OTHERS Respondents
| Citation | 1984 PLP 177 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | N/A |
| Parties | Qazi SARDAR BAHADAR-Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MIN1STRY OF HEALTH, ISLAMABAD, AND OTHERS Respondents |
| Primary Law | Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1984 PLP 177 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1984 PLP 177 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: N/A.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1984 PLP 177 (SCMR) (Qazi SARDAR BAHADAR-Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, MIN1STRY OF HEALTH, ISLAMABAD, AND OTHERS Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing : 22nd November, 1983.
Headnotes / Summary
(From the order of the Federal Service Tribunal, dated 32nd May, 1983, passed in Appeal No. 82(R) of 1983). -- S. 4--Appeal filed in Department hopelessly time-barred and rightly dismissed-Service Tribunal justified in dismissing appeal. Petitioner in person.
Judgment & Decree
M. S. H. QURAISHI, J.‑‑The petitioner, an Upper Division Clerk in the Central Government Hospital, Rawalpindi, went abroad on 7th June, 1978 on four months' ex‑Pakistan leave. According to him, the leave had been extended by another four months and then for six months. He applied for further extension of the leave for a period of five years in March, 1980 but in the meantime his services had been terminated with effect from 12‑12‑1979, the intimation of which was received by him while still abroad on 17.4‑1980. He applied for reinstatement on 18‑11‑1982 but the same was rejected on 6‑3‑X983, against which he preferred an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal. The Tribunal declined to interfere as in its view the appeal filed by the petitioner in the Department had been hopelessly time‑barred and had been rightly dismissed. The Tribunal, therefore, dismissed the petitioner's appeal by the impugned order dated 22‑5‑1983.
2. We have heard the petitioner in person but we find no good ground to interfere. Leave to appeal, is, therefore, refused. N.Z. M. Petition dismissed.