1996 PLP 1723 (SCMR)
ABDUL GHANI CHAUDHRY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENT
| Citation | 1996 PLP 1723 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Manzoor Hussain Sial |
| Parties | ABDUL GHANI CHAUDHRY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENT |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)'‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1996 PLP 1723 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)'‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1996 PLP 1723 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Manzoor Hussain Sial.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1996 PLP 1723 (SCMR) (ABDUL GHANI CHAUDHRY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENT). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Bashir Ahmad Ansari and Tanvir Bashir Ansari, instructed by Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 29th March, 1995.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, dated 25‑7‑1994 passed in Appeal No.278(L) of 1993). ‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Promotion and seniority‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider as to whether civil servant could have been denied his promotion and seniority on those grounds which were stated in impugned order, more particularly when adverse remarks had already been expunged.
Judgment & Decree
(On appeal from the judgment of the Federal Service Tribunal, dated 25‑7‑1994 passed in Appeal No.278(L) of 1993). ‑‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Promotion and seniority‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider as to whether civil servant could have been denied his promotion and seniority on those grounds which were stated in impugned order, more particularly when adverse remarks had already been expunged. Bashir Ahmad Ansari and Tanvir Bashir Ansari, instructed by Khan Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 29th March, 1995. MUHAMMAD MUNIR KHAN, J.‑‑‑Leave to appeal is granted to consider as to whether the petitioner could have been denied his promotion and seniority on the grounds stated in the impugned order, more particularly when the adverse remarks had already been expunged. A.A./A‑1355/S Leave granted.