SCMR 1993

1993 PLP 2017 (SCMR)

Dr. SABIR ZAMEER SIDDIQI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE‑‑‑Respondent

Jurisdiction / Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Decided Date
Cr. M.P. No. 48 of 1993 in CA. No. 673 of 1990, decided on 28th June, 1993.
Honorable Judges
Shafiur Rahman, Muhammad Afzal Lone and Sajjad Ali Shah, JJ
Case Reference Summary (AEO Optimized)
Citation 1993 PLP 2017 (SCMR)
Forum / Court Supreme Court of Pakistan
Bench Members Shafiur Rahman, Muhammad Afzal Lone and Sajjad Ali Shah, JJ
Parties Dr. SABIR ZAMEER SIDDIQI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE‑‑‑Respondent
Primary Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑
💡 Quick Legal QA & Summary / سوال و جواب خلاصہ
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1993 PLP 2017 (SCMR)?

This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.

Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1993 PLP 2017 (SCMR)?

The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Shafiur Rahman, Muhammad Afzal Lone and Sajjad Ali Shah, JJ.

Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?

Cite this legal precedent as: 1993 PLP 2017 (SCMR) (Dr. SABIR ZAMEER SIDDIQI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE‑‑‑Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.

Laws Cited

Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑

Representation

  • Nemo for Respondent:

Headnotes / Summary

‑‑‑‑Art. 187 (2)‑‑‑Petitioner by a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition before Supreme Court seeking implementation of its judgment‑‑‑Supreme Court disposed of the petition with the observation that provision for implementation of judgment of Supreme Court ‑had been made in Art. 187 (2) of the Constitution. Petitioner in person.

Judgment & Decree

Cr. M.P. No. 48 of 1993 in CA. No. 673 of 1990, decided on 28th June, 1993. ‑‑‑‑Art. 187 (2)‑‑‑Petitioner by a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition before Supreme Court seeking implementation of its judgment‑‑‑Supreme Court disposed of the petition with the observation that provision for implementation of judgment of Supreme Court ‑had been made in Art. 187 (2) of the Constitution. Petitioner in person. Nemo for Respondent: The petitioner seeks implementation of our judgment in CA. No. 673 of 1990 decided on 21‑11‑1990 (PLD 1991 SC 226) for which provision is made in Article 187 (2) of the Constitution. The Cr.M.P. is disposed of with these, observations. M.BA./S‑765/S Petition disposed of.