1986 PLP 1206 (SCMR)
ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PAKISTAN REVENUES, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD — Petitioner Versus ARBAB MUKHTAR AHMAD — Respondent
| Citation | 1986 PLP 1206 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | High Court |
| Bench Members | Muhammad Haleem, C. J., Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ |
| Parties | ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PAKISTAN REVENUES, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD — Petitioner Versus ARBAB MUKHTAR AHMAD — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1986 PLP 1206 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1986 PLP 1206 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the High Court bench comprising: Muhammad Haleem, C. J., Shafiur Rahman and Zaffar Hussain Mirza, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1986 PLP 1206 (SCMR) (ACCOUNTANT-GENERAL PAKISTAN REVENUES, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD — Petitioner Versus ARBAB MUKHTAR AHMAD — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney-General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner.
- M. Zahoorul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent.
- Date of hearing: 14th April, 1986.
- Munir A. Sheikh, Deputy Attorney‑General and Ch. Akhtar Ali, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- M. Zahoorul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court and Imtiaz Muhammad Khan, Advocate‑on‑Record for Respondent.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment and order, dated 28-10-1985 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal in Appeal No. 300(R)/1984). --Art. 212(3)--Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Ss. 9 & 17- Government servant performing functions of higher post--Benefits of higher post--Entitlment to--Government servant without his being regularly promoted, who is qualified and performs functions of higher post, is entitled to draw pay and periodical increments of higher post. Civil Appeal No. 23 of 1985 rel.
Judgment & Decree
MUHAMMAD HALEEM, C.J.‑‑A similar question, namely whether, a Government servant without his being regularly promoted, but who is qualified and performs the functions of the higher post is eligible to draw the benefit of the higher post such as pay with periodical increments, was considered in Civil Appeal No. 23 of 1985 and others, and it was held that he was so entitled to draw the pay and the periodical increments of the higher post. Accordingly, this petition is without substance and is dismissed. M. I. Petition dismissed.