2001 PLP 1855 (SCMR)
Syed SHAUKAT ALI ZAIDI‑‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑‑Respondents
| Citation | 2001 PLP 1855 (SCMR) |
| Forum / Court | Supreme Court of Pakistan |
| Bench Members | Rana Bhagwan Das, Syed Deedar Hussain Shah and Hamid Ali MirZa, JJ |
| Parties | Syed SHAUKAT ALI ZAIDI‑‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑‑Respondents |
| Primary Law | Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 2001 PLP 1855 (SCMR)?
This judgment primarily cites: Constitution of Pakistan (1973)‑‑‑ as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 2001 PLP 1855 (SCMR)?
The case was heard and decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan bench comprising: Rana Bhagwan Das, Syed Deedar Hussain Shah and Hamid Ali MirZa, JJ.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 2001 PLP 1855 (SCMR) (Syed SHAUKAT ALI ZAIDI‑‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑‑Respondents). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Dr. Qazi Khalid Ali, Advocate Supreme Court and Miss Wajahat Niaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner.
- Nemo for Respondents.
- Date of hearing: 24th May, 2001.
Headnotes / Summary
(On appeal from the judgment dated 1‑1‑2001 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad in Appeal No.27(K)(CS) of 2000). ‑‑‑‑Art.212(3)‑‑‑Recording of Annual Confidential Report by the officer working in same pay scale and grade and beyond the prescribed time‑‑ Validity‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to consider and examine the question as to whether the Reporting Officer was not competent to record A.C.R. of an officer working in the same .pay scale and grade, whether the A.C.Rs. recorded far beyond the time prescribed by the Government for recording A.C.Rs. had lost its efficacy and whether the judgment of Service Tribunal suffered from deviation from law laid down by Supreme Court in Government of Punjab v. Shamsul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC
684. Government of Punjab v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC 684 ref.
Judgment & Decree
Government of Punjab v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi PLD 1986 SC 684 ref. Dr. Qazi Khalid Ali, Advocate Supreme Court and Miss Wajahat Niaz, Advocate‑on‑Record for Petitioner. Nemo for Respondents. Date of hearing: 24th May, 2001. Petitioner is aggrieved by the Order dated 1‑1‑2001 of the Federal Tribunal whereby his Service Appeal impugning the vires of adverse remarks for the year 1995‑96 recorded by the then Chairman Income Tax Appellate tribunal was dismissed. The learned Service Tribunal while dismissing the petitioner's appeal has allowed the appeal to the extent of expunging the observation in pen picture in the ACRs of the petitioner with respect to his physical disability of vision.
2. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and examining the impugned judgment leave to appeal is granted inter alia to consider and examine the following questions of law:‑‑ (i) Whether the Reporting Officer is not competent to record ACR of an officer working, in the same Pay Scale and Grade? (ii) Whether the ACRs recorded far beyond the time prescribed by the Government for recording ACRs have lost their efficacy? and (iii) Whether the impugned judgment suffers from deviation of law laid down by this Court in Government of Punjab v. Ehsanul Haq Sethi (PLD 1986 SC 684). H.B.T./S‑124/S Leave granted.