Appeal to Privy Council
Appeal to Privy Council legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Contempt of Court-Appeal to Privy Council-To be decided on same general rules as apply to appeals from criminal convictions.
"Appeal to Privy Council", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946704
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appeal to Privy Council"
P L D 1956 Privy Council 70
NANA ATTA KARIKARI and another‑Appellants Versus NANA OWARE AGYEKUM II‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1954 Privy Council 95
MEGHJI LAKHAMSHI AND BROTHERS‑Appellants Versus FURNITURE WORKSHOP‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1957 Privy Council 20
ROBERT TAYLOR NOEL SIMPSON‑Appellant Versus THE GENERAL MEDICAL COUNCIL‑ — Respondent
Court:P L D 1956 Privy Council 43
ANDREAS CHARILAOU ZAKOS and another-Appellants Versus THE QUEEN-Respondent
Court:P L D 1954 Federal Court 87
2. FAIZ AHMAD FAIZ Versus THE CROW N‑ Respondent
Court:P L D 1951 Privy Council 23
ARTHUR REGINALD PERERA-Appellant Versus THE KING-Respondent
Court:P L D 1968 Lahore 207
DIN MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus HIDAYAT HUSSAIN‑Respondent
Court: West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959)----S. 15 (4) read with Explanation‑Order passed "on appeal"‑Order passed by Appellate Authority refusing to set aside his appellate ex parte order, held, not passed "on" appeal‑Such order not appealable to High Court under S. 15(4)‑Distinction drawn between order passed "on" appeal and order passed in exercise of "appellate jurisdiction"‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908) applicable only in so far as "procedural" provisions are concerned and not in respect of "substantive" provision like the "right" of appeal‑Controller and Appellate Authority not Courts‑Ramaswami Udhayar and others v. Sevu Rama Aru Ramanathan Chettiar A I R 1942 Mad. 357 fol., Khadim Mohy‑ud‑Din and another v. Ch. Rehmat Ali Nagra and another P L D 1965 S C 459 ref.‑Case‑law exhaustively examined.P L D 1959 Privy Council 84
ROBERT CHATTAN ROSS‑CLUNIS‑-Appellant Versus VASSOS PAPADOPOULLOS and others‑-Respondents
Court: Emergency Powers (Collective Punishment) Regulations 1955 to (No. I) 1955, Regulation 3 and Emergency Powers Order in Council, 1939, S. 6 (I)‑Regulation whether ultra vires the powers rested in Governor‑Police Act (V of 1861), S. 15.P L D 1953 Lahore 26
QADIR BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus THE LAHORE CENTRAL CO‑OPERATIVE BANK and another‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1960 (W
DR. PESHOTON‑Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF CONTROLLING REVENUE AUTHORITY, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: