Cancellation of route permit
Cancellation of route permit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner filed appeal before Chairman Provincial Transport Authority wherein direction was issued to Secretary Regional Transport Authority to allow the petitioner to ply his bus and to issue time table in his favour
Said order was not complied with and order of cancellation of route-permit was passed without considering the legal aspect of the matter that both the orders were conflicting
Provisions of Provincial Motor Vehicles Ordinance, 1965 were not adhered while passing the impugned order as respondent-Transport Authority decided the fate of route permit without directing any inquiry or probe
Transport Authority which granted a permit might cancel or suspend the same for such period which was considered proper
Cancellation of route permit could be ordered only by the Transport Authority who granted the same subject to procedure prescribed by law and rules
Authority had no jurisdiction to issue any such order without making probe or conducting inquiry through concerned Transport Authority which had granted route permit
Authority had based his order on the verbal assertion of the party despite the fact that relevant record and reports of concerned Transport Authority was not available
Impugned order had no legal sanction and same was not sustainable and was set aside and Transport Authority was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law
Constitutional petition was disposed of accordingly.
"Cancellation of route permit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124946717
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Cancellation of route permit"
P L D 1987 Quetta 223
AHMED SHAH‑‑Petitioner Versus Haji ABDUL HALEEM and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S. 62, proviso‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑Maxim: Audi alterm partem‑‑Cancellation of route permit‑‑Notice to affected party‑‑Nothing on record available to show that petitioner had any intimation about proceedings initiated by Authority regarding cancellation of his route permit‑‑Order of Authority showing that same had been passed merely on the basis of certain departmental enquiries without obtaining any explanation of petitioner‑‑Held such orders, apart from being repugnant to statutory requirement were also clearly violative of principle of audi alterm partem and negating principle of natural justice and thus were void as much as an order which was coram non judice and as such did not exist in the eye of law.‑‑Maxim.2014 C L C 1433
YAR MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN through Chairman and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan1995 C L C 1123
ABDUR RAZZAK‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD QASIM and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: QuettaP L D 1961 W
FARZAND ALI‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
Court:P L D 2010 Quetta 16
ABDUL REHMAN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALOCHISTAN through Chairman and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High Court1969 S C M R 285
LAHORE FEROZEPUR TRANSPORT CO Petitioner Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE (TRANSPORT APPELLATE AUTHORITY)
Court: High Court1965 S C M R 1373
ABUL BASEAR AND ANOTHER‑‑Petitioners Versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: High Court1998 M L D 1678
NASRULLAH — Petitioner Versus JAFFAR ULLAH and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Quetta2005 S C M R 1299
MALIR CANTT. BOARD — Petitioner Versus Syed TANVEER ALI — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1995 C L C 78
SIKANDAR KHAN and another‑‑Petitioners Versus ISHAQZAI and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Quetta