Home Maxims & Terms Stretching of meaning meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Stretching of meaning

Stretching of meaning legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2022 CLD 352 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Pith and substance", principle ofApplicabilityStretching of meaningLimit

Constitution is a living and organic document prone to evolve and adapt to new circumstances even if it is not formally amended

Courts are required to adopt a broad based, dynamic, and progressive approach

Words either in the entries or in any provision of the Constitution are to be given a dynamic interpretation in keeping pace with development of society and exigencies of time

Entries do not confer any legislative power but only point out to the broad fields/legislative heads in which legislative powers can be exercised

Words have to be given ordinary, grammatical and natural meaning and cannot be construed in a narrow or pedantic manner

Limit to which a word can be stretched for a meaning is determined by the principle of 'pith and substance'

Pith detonates 'essence of something' or the 'true nature', while substance means 'most significant or essential part of something'

As such the doctrine is applied to ascertain purpose of a given law, its essential character and whether subject matter legislated on is related to Federation or not

By applying the doctrine, basic purpose and effect of the law are discovered and so also so the fact as to which level of government has jurisdiction or authority to frame the law

It can also be found out whether legislation, under challenge, made by one of the Legislatures, is rightly enacted or it has trespassed or encroached upon domain of other Legislature

By applying the doctrine, it can be determined whether or not Parliament has the authority to deal with a given subject.

2016 PTD 622 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Stretching of meaningPrinciples

Interpretation should be such that if stretched to its maximum elasticity it should not cross limits of rationality.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Stretching of meaning", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/124955432

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Stretching of meaning"

PTD 2016
Suits Nos. 1764, 2214, 2299, 2300, 2339, 2439, 2357 and 2515 of 2014 and 142, 794, 937, 1034 and 1035 of 2015, decided on 8th September, 2015.

2016 P T D 622

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others Versus PAKISTAN THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION and others

Court: Sindh High Court
PLC 1977
Appeal No. 406 of 1975, decided on 20th January 1976.

1977 P L C 666

LAGHART CORPORATION, SADIQABAD Versus ALLAH DIWAYA

Court: IVth Labour Court Punjab
PLD 2019
2019-April-15

P L D 2019 Federal Shariat Court 13

FAREHA BOKHARI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2008
Writ Petition No. 6189-Q of 2008, decided on 2nd June, 2008.

2008 Y L R 2505

REHAN NASIR — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, RAIL BAZAR, DISTRICT FAISALABAD and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1991
Writ Petition No‑936 of 1969, heard on 31st March, 1991.

1991 C L C 1797

A. STRATTA ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1956
Civil Revision No. 177 of 1955, decided on 6th March 1956.

P L D 1956 (W

GHULAM SARWAR‑Defendant‑Applicant Versus ALLAH BAKHSH and others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Revision Nos. 221 and 222 of 1983, heard on 25th February, 1986.

1986 P Cr

WARYAM‑‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2020
1st Criminal Bail Application No. S-655 of 2019, decided on 30th December, 2019.

2020 Y L R 1354

FAHEEM AHMED — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh (Larkana Bench)
PTD 2001
Tax Cases Nos. 1221 to 1223 of 1984 (References Nos. 1040 to 1042 of 1984), decided on 26th March, 1998.

2001 P T D 1328

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus HALAI MENON. ASSOCIATION

Court: 244 I T R 357
PTD 2015
Customs Appeal No.Q-402 of 2012, decided on 12th August, 2014.

2015 P T D (Trib

NIAZ MUHAMMAD Versus DIRECTOR OF INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, FBR, QUETTA

Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal