Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Reasonable time meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Reasonable time

Reasonable time legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 CLC 776 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Reasonable time "???Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Reasonable time", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1284

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Reasonable time"

YLR 2002
Writ Petition No.6490 of 1994, decided on 10th January, 2002.

2002 Y L R 2792

Messrs TRIPPLE‑M (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director, Shahid Malik ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 4 others‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1986
Writ Petition No. 410 of 1985, decided on 30th September, 1985.

1986 C L C 1265

INAYATULLAH‑‑Petitioner Versus AHMAD DIN and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2019
2015-August-7

P L D 2019 Supreme Court 677

Mst. KUBRA AMJAD — Appellant Versus Mst. YASMEEN TARIQ and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2019
2015-August-7

P L D 2019 Supreme Court 704

Mst. KUBRA AMJAD — Appellant Versus Mst. YASMEEN TARIQ and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1954
Regular Second Appeal No. 90 of 1952, decided on 1st June 1954, from the decree of the Court of Fayyaz Hassan Shah, District Judge, Rawalpindi, dated the 6th December 1951, affirming that of Abdus Samad Khan, Senior Civil Judge, Rawalpindi, dated the 12th March 1951.

P L D 1954 Lahore 634

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus RAJA FAZAL DAD KHAN‑Plaintiff‑Respondent

Court:
PLC(CS) 1989
Appeal No. LHR-540 of 1988, decided on 24th January, 1989.

1989 P L C 649

M. SHAMIM RAIDER Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No.107 of 1991, decided on 13th July, 1991.

1991 S C M R 2149

MUHAMMAD IRSHAD — Appellant Versus Ch. FAZAL HAQ and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 1997
As to what definite time shall be considered as the reasonable time within which an Assessing Officer shall have the power to levy the Fund if he omits to levy it at the time of making an assessment order has not been precisely determined by any precedent. The reasonableness of the time is decided on case to case basis. There is a need that a reasonable upper limit of the reasonable time is indicated. Such indication is necessary' for the sake of convenience and certainly being the relevant canons of tax administration.

1997 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
SCMR 1994
C.M.P. No. 335 of 1993 in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 1992, decided on 25th September, 1993.

1994 S C M R 360

MUNIR AHMED ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAHID MAHMOOD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1989
Writ Petition No.269 of 1985, heard on 27th November, 1988.

P L D 1989 Lahore 69

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑‑Petitioner Versus NASREEN BEGUM through Legal Heirs and 3 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ---S. 9(6) as amended by West Pakistan Family Courts (Amendment) Act (I of 1969)--West Pakistan Family Courts Rules, 1965, R.13-Setting aside an ex parte decree--Limitation--Conflict between provisions of Family Courts Act and the Family Courts Rules--Effect-Reasonable time for making an application for setting aside an ex parte decree has been prescribed under S.9(6) of the Act, while under R.13 of the Rules framed under the Act, time limit is prescribed as thirty days for setting aside of such decree--To the extent that R.13 prescribes the test of reasonable time to thirty days, it clearly goes beyond the provisions of S.9(6) of Family Courts Act, 1964 and cannot be sustained.

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library