Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Quasi Judicial body meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Quasi Judicial body

Quasi Judicial body legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1958 PLD 626 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Quasi Judicial body -Order passed against person - to his detriment without notice to him-Violation of natural justice. It is now well-established that any order passed against a person to his detriment by any quasi-judicial body contravenes the canon of natural justice if it is passed without notice to him.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Quasi Judicial body", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22029

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Quasi Judicial body"

PLD 1951
Appeal No. 1052 of 1949‑50, decided on 17th May, 1951 from the order of Regional Transport Authority Rawalpindi.

P

COMPANY, GUJRANWALA‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, RAWALPINDI‑Respondent

Court:
CLD 2018
2018-June-21

2018 C L D 1194

SHAUKAT SHAFI SECURITIES (PVT.) LIMITED — Appellant Versus EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, (PRPD), SECP, ISLAMABAD — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
PLC 2025
----Art. 10-A---Right of fair trial---Scope---Right to a fair hearing entails the right to have one's case decided on merits by a competent forum, after affording an opportunity of being heard---Decision rendered without entering into the merits of the controversy, especially where serious allegations such as submission of forged documents are involved, amounts to a denial of due process.

2025 P L C 190

ALLIED BANK LIMITED through President/Chief Executive and 2 others Versus FULL BENCH NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD and 2 others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLD 1965
Writ Petition No. 354 of 1964, decided on 3rd March 1965.

P L D 1965 (W

UMARA KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1951
Appellate Side No.. 1027 of 1949‑50, decided on 26th April 1951.

P

SOCIETY LTD., MONTGOMERY‑Appellant Versus REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MULTAN and other‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 147 of 1957, decided on 20th March 1958.

P L D 1958 (W

ABDUL AZIZ‑Petitioner Versus THE RENT CONTROLLER and others‑Respondents

Court:
CLC 2014
2013-May-30

2014 C L C 25

RIAZ HUSSAIN and another — Petitioners Versus TEVTA through Chairman, Lahore and 13 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 1990
Constitutional Petition No. D‑130 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 265 of 1990, decided on 9th April, 1990.

1990 P L C (C

ABDUL AZIZ Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH and others

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1958
Civil Appeal No. 16 of 1958, decided on 8th May, 1958.

P L D 1958 S

MUHAMMAD HANIF and others‑Appellants Versus THE PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KARACHI and others‑Respondents

Court: (a) Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939) as amended by Motor Vehicles (Sind Amendment) Act (XIV of 1948), Ss. 47 & 58‑Con siderations which should weigh with Transport Authority in granting permit‑Under section 47 as amended, Transport Authority absolved of obligation to take into consideration representation made by persons already providing transport facilities in deciding whether to grant or refuse permit‑Application for renewal‑Not entitled to preference over applications for new permits.
PLD 1958
Civil Appeals Nos. 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 59, 60, 61 and 62 of 1958, decided at Murree on 21st July 1958.

P L D 1958'Supreme Court (Pak

THE TARIQ TRANSPORT COMPANY, LAHORE‑Appellant Versus (1) THE SARGODHA‑BHERA BUS SERVICE, SARGODHA, (2) THE REGIONAL TRANS PORT AUTHORITY, LAHORE, and (3) THE PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LAHORE ‑Respondents

Court:

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library