For his own occupation
For his own occupation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
S. 13 (3) (i) (a)-Eviction-Words and phrases-Expression 'for his own occupation' used in sub-paragraph (i) (a) of S. 13 of Ordinance, held, embraces not only needs of landlord but also needs of his family and family includes his children.-[Words and phrases].
"For his own occupation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2640
Precedents & Case Laws citing "For his own occupation"
P L A 1981 Lahore 201
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Appellant Versus Mst. AZIZAN AND 4 OTHER-Respondents
Court: S. 13 (3) (a) (i) (a), (il) (a)-Expression "for his own occupation" in cl. (i) (a) and expression "for his own use" occurring in el. (ii)(a)Connotation-Landlord may occupy residential building along with his family as expression "for his own occupation" embraces not only his needs but also needs of landlord's family-Law permits landlord to get non‑residential building vacated only either for himself or for use of his male children‑Order of ejectment passed against a tenant of non‑residential premises (shop) on ground of same being required in good faith by landlord for his own use‑‑Held, does not ensure to benefit of landlord's legal representatives after his death.‑‑Words and phrases.P L D 1967 Karachi 437
ADAM ALI HASSANALI‑Appellant Versus Mst. RUBAB BAI‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court1989 C L C 732
NEK MUHAMMAD‑‑Appellant Versus Hafiz ABDUL HAMEED‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1989CLC541
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD RIAZUL HAO‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1980 C L C 984
Naji LAL BUX-Appellant Versus Mistry ALLAHDAD-Respondent
Court: Karachi1984 S C M R 722
SIRAJ DIN‑Appellant Versus SUBA (THROUGH His LEGAL HEIRS)‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ S. 13(3) (a) (!)‑Ejectment on ground of landlord's need for his own occupation‑Words "suitable for his need" in clause (b) of S. 13 (3) (a) (f)‑Connotation‑Landlord seeking ejectment on ground that he wants premises for running free dispensary for poor Judgment of High Court that such application for ejectment does not fall within scope of S. 13‑Held, unexceptionable.‑Words and phrases.P L D 1968 Lahore 863
AGHA MUHAMMAD ILYAS‑Petitioner Versus MASJID COMMITTEE, RAHIM YAR KHAN — Respondent
Court:1989 C L C 1077
LAL KHAN‑‑Appellant Versus Mrs. AZRA FAZLI‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1982 C L C 1934
FAWZI ALI KAZMI‑Appellant Versus ABDULLA AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1987 S C M R 1173
and others‑‑Petitioners Versus The ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court