1987 PLP r (PCRLJ)
MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
| Citation | 1987 PLP r (PCRLJ) |
| Forum / Court | Lahore |
| Bench Members | Rustam S. Sidhwa, J |
| Parties | MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent |
| Primary Law | Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) |
Q1: What are the key laws and sections cited in 1987 PLP r (PCRLJ)?
This judgment primarily cites: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) as referenced in Pakistani case law index.
Q2: Which judicial bench decided the case 1987 PLP r (PCRLJ)?
The case was heard and decided by the Lahore bench comprising: Rustam S. Sidhwa, J.
Q3: What is the official citation format for this judgment on Pakistan Law Portal?
Cite this legal precedent as: 1987 PLP r (PCRLJ) (MUHAMMAD SHARIF — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent). Read the full summary and cross-referenced laws free on Pakistan Law Portal.
Laws Cited
Representation
- Shahid Hussain Qadri for Petitioner.
Headnotes / Summary
S. 526--Transfer of proceedings--Genuine`' apprehension--Court allegedly making certain observations--Allegation of innumerable adjournments--No details of observation made nor details of adjournments granted given, petition dismissed in limine.
Judgment & Decree
Criminal Miscellaneous No.225-T of 1986, decided on 29th November, 1986. --S. 526--Transfer of proceedings--Genuine`' apprehension--Court allegedly making certain observations--Allegation of innumerable adjournments--No details of observation made nor details of adjournments granted given, petition dismissed in limine. Shahid Hussain Qadri for Petitioner. This is a petition under section 526, Cr.P.C. for the transfer of the case titled Muhammad Sharif v. Berkha etc. from the Court of Mr. Ashiq Hussain Butt, Magistrate 1st Class, Ferozewala, to some other competent Court.
2. On behalf of the petitioner it is submitted that the trial Magistrate has been making certain observations which have raised genuine apprehension in the mind of the petitioner that he will not get impartial' justice. It is further submitted that the partiality and bias of the Court is also manifest from the fact that innumerable adjournments have been given to the accused and the case is being proceeded in a lax manner.
3. No details of the observations made nor of the adjournments granted have been given in this petition. This petition is dismissed in limine. S. A. Petition dismissed in limine.